Closed ojha-aditya closed 1 day ago
Does it not check for pylint by default @zbpetersbuf? Both build tests show Pytest somehow.
@laserlab ya the build seems to have issue I was going to bring it up with Dr Thomay, since pylint seems to be missing for everyone and is instead replaced with another pytests
Yeah, I guess it is fixed now in PR #19, will update the branch before anyone take up the review itself.
Yes it now checks for lint, I guess now it will be easier for the reviewer to check the pylint status.
I discussed with @laserlab and will remove the functionality for plotting from the calculus module as that is not required.
@zbpetersbuf just putting here so it can be put on hold before merging. Will push the necessary commits tonight.
So just let me know when it can be merged, ill be sure to check everything before bed
@ojha-aditya You still need a reviewer, ill be your second one
So just let me know when it can be merged, ill be sure to check everything before bed
It is ready to be reviewed and merged now, I removed the plotting functionality and improved the docstrings in the last commit.
@ojha-aditya You still need a reviewer, ill be your second one
I guess we could assign randomly if no one takes up the review by themselves?
Ya I mean that's why I felt like your review doesn't have to be your partner, since sometimes it could just work better if it was anyone
Implemented the Trapezoidal method according to #2
Linting
Contents
Labels and Milestone
Reviewer