ISSN 1552-3586 | Criminal justice policy review |Produktiv

[kdr154]

Bei dieser Zeitschrift gibt es nicht zu korrigieren. Sie kann ins Poduktivverfahren aufgenommen werden.

[socheres]

@IxKo können Sie bitte überprüfen und in "zota" ändern.

[IxKo]

@kdr154 Die Artikel von Heft 2020,5 (https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5) wurden alle "first published 2019". Demnach müsste dann das Erscheinungsjahr 2019 sein und das Berichtsjahr 2020, oder? Beim Testen mit Nu wird in Marc-936 und -773 das Jahr 2019 ausgegeben, obwohl es sich um ein Heft aus dem Jahr 2020 handelt. Marc-264 Erscheinungsjahr 2019 würde wiederum stimmen.

Soll dieser Issue angepasst werden oder soll ein neuer geöffnet werden?

[IxKo]

Außerdem mache ich mir allgemein noch Sorgen, ob die neuen Lizenzangaben ZZ, KW etc. korrekt rüberkommen, da wir das in der Test-DB noch nie hatten.

[kdr154]

Den ersten Punlkt sollten wir einmal grundsätzlich mit Frau Kellmeyer, Herrn Faßnacht und den anderen Katalogisierern besprechen. Die Lizenzangaben sind ein Problem, das die IT und das BSZ zu lösen haben. Leider auch beim halbautomatischen Verfahren, wo sie nie mitkommen. Aber wenn das ein Ko-Kriterium ist, kann im Moment nichts live geschaltet werden. Oder? Ich würde das Issue erst mal offen lassen.

[socheres]

@mtrojan-ub wenn ich mit "Atypton Journals.js" (= Multiple) die Daten in Nu herunterlade, dann ist das Datumsfeld "date: 2019-05-31" (Erscheinungsjahr first published) und mit "Sage Journals.js" "date: 2020-06-01" (Berichtsjahr). Normalerweise ist das "item.date" in Zotero immer das Berichtsjahr. Und wenn das Berichtsjahr vom Erscheinungsjahr wie in diesem Fall abweicht, ist das Berichtsjahr maßgebend. Welche der Translator beim Herunterladen in Nu verwendet wurde, sieht man leider nicht im Logfile. Was die Lizenzfrage angeht: wichtig im Zotkat war bisher die OA-Zeitschriften als LF zu katalogisieren. Die Details zu den Lizenzfragen besprechen wir in einem VC-Meeting.

[mtrojan-ub]

Der translation server gibt aktuell nicht zurück welcher Translator verwendet wurde. Da im zotero translation server viele asynchrone Aufrufe verwendet werde und diese zwischen verschiedenen Komponenten durchgereicht werden ist die Einarbeitung für uns ziemlich aufwendig, aber vielleicht kennt jemand von Zotero selbst eine schnelle Möglichkeit so etwas zur Verfügung zu stellen. Ich habe dafür mal einen Issue bei Zotero eröffnet, siehe zotero/translation-server#115

[IxKo]

1078

[IxKo]

@socheres Hier wird das Berichtsjahr falsch erfasst.

[socheres]

@mtrojan-ub nach commit bitte "ready for testing" hinzufügen.

[mtrojan-ub]

Dieser Issue wurde scheinbar in keinem Deiner commits referenziert, aufgrund des besonderen Wunsches aber hiermit trotzdem => ready for testing

[kdr154]

Erscheinungs- und Berichtsjahr nach den neuesten Richtlinien durchgehend nicht richtig. Alle Artikel sind zum ersten Mal 2019 publiziert worden. In 264, 773 und 936 steht entsprechend 2019. Richtig wäre aber in allen Fällen 2020, da die Aufsätze in Heft 31.2020,5 erschienen sind.

[socheres]

function getSearchResults angepasst, damit beim Mutilple-DL "Sage.js" genommen wird. Bisher wird im Zoteroserver "Atypton.js" eingesetzt.

[kdr154]

Passt jetzt bei zota und zotkat

[socheres]

Die Änderung wurde noch nicht ins Master übernommen und das Testergebnis in zota sieht dementsprechend auch aus "2019". Nur in Zotkat ist das Problem behoben, d.h. statt "Atypon.js" wird "Sage.js" verwendet. Mit "Try URL" getestet

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000nab a22004452  4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">KrimDok#2020-09-30#D5B25F6525D5402798CADE6CF70CA721279C87A1</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">DE-2619</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</controlfield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.1177/0887403419851850</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="b">ger</subfield>
<subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">2,1</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mourtgos, Scott M.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">The Overlooked Perspective of Police Trust in the Public: Measurement and Effects on Police Job Behaviors:</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Many studies have looked at the public’s trust in the police, but very few have examined police trust in the public. Based on Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman’s model of trust, we conducted two studies. The first study created scales measuring the antecedents of trust and assessed police trust in the public based on a survey of 990 police officers from across the United States. The second study used the trust measures developed in the first study, as well as supervisors’ evaluations and archival performance data, in a study of the job performance of 135 police officers. We found that officers who had greater trust in the public engaged in more proactive policing and made more arrests. We discuss the implications of these findings, including what they mean for police officers and the communities they serve.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mayer, Roger C.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Wise, Richard A.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">O’Rourke, Holly</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8">
<subfield code="i">In: </subfield>
<subfield code="t">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1552-3594</subfield>
<subfield code="w">(DE-627)306656345</subfield>
<subfield code="g">31 (2019), 5, Seite 639-672</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-2619</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419851850</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403419851850</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">mkri</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">zota</subfield>
<subfield code="2">LOK</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="936" ind1="u" ind2="w">
<subfield code="d">31</subfield>
<subfield code="e">5</subfield>
<subfield code="h">639-672</subfield>
<subfield code="j">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="JOU" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="URL" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="ZID" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">435</subfield>
<subfield code="b">krimdok</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<record>
<leader>00000nab a22004452  4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">KrimDok#2020-09-30#6706E7D38F326B6C9DDBBCEFA39CDC95D15EDEA1</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">DE-2619</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</controlfield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.1177/0887403419840804</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="b">ger</subfield>
<subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">2,1</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Nowacki, Jeffrey S.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Gender Equality and Sentencing Outcomes: An Examination of State Courts:</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The current study examined whether measures of structural gender equality conditioned the effects of defendant gender on incarceration decisions. Using data from the State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) database, multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between both case- and county-level variables on incarceration decisions on a sample of defendants sentenced in state courts. Results indicated that women were less likely to be sentenced to prison than men, but there was no gender difference for jail and noncustodial sentences; however, the structural gender equality measures exerted only slight influences over sentencing outcomes.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8">
<subfield code="i">In: </subfield>
<subfield code="t">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1552-3594</subfield>
<subfield code="w">(DE-627)306656345</subfield>
<subfield code="g">31 (2019), 5, Seite 673-695</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-2619</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419840804</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403419840804</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">mkri</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">zota</subfield>
<subfield code="2">LOK</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="936" ind1="u" ind2="w">
<subfield code="d">31</subfield>
<subfield code="e">5</subfield>
<subfield code="h">673-695</subfield>
<subfield code="j">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="JOU" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="URL" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="ZID" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">435</subfield>
<subfield code="b">krimdok</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<record>
<leader>00000nab a22004452  4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">KrimDok#2020-09-30#E6B4DDA1F8A12F6BD3E2442159BB2FE0BC58BA74</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">DE-2619</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</controlfield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.1177/0887403419870848</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="b">ger</subfield>
<subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">2,1</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Wodahl, Eric J.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Are Jail Sanctions More Punitive Than Community-Based Punishments? An Examination Into the Perceived Severity of Alternative Sanctions in Community Supervision:</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The use of sanctions in community supervision has received considerable attention in recent years. Fueled in large part by the attention given to the swift, certain, and fair (SCF) sanctioning model, many agencies have adopted sanctioning programs, which often rely heavily on the use of short-term jail incarceration. In addition to jail, there exist a number of alternative, community-based punishments that can be utilized to respond to instances of noncompliance, including enhanced drug testing and community service hours. Little is known, however, about how individuals perceive community-based sanctions compared with jail. This study addresses this issue by examining perceptions of sanctions among individuals under community supervision. Survey findings indicate that community-based punishments are not viewed as being substantially less punitive than jail incarceration. In addition, perceptions of sanction severity are influenced by a variety of individual, experiential, and supervision-level factors. The policy implications of the study findings are discussed.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Garland, Brett E.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Schweitzer, Kimberly</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8">
<subfield code="i">In: </subfield>
<subfield code="t">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1552-3594</subfield>
<subfield code="w">(DE-627)306656345</subfield>
<subfield code="g">31 (2019), 5, Seite 696-720</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-2619</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419870848</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403419870848</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">mkri</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">zota</subfield>
<subfield code="2">LOK</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="936" ind1="u" ind2="w">
<subfield code="d">31</subfield>
<subfield code="e">5</subfield>
<subfield code="h">696-720</subfield>
<subfield code="j">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="JOU" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="URL" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="ZID" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">435</subfield>
<subfield code="b">krimdok</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<record>
<leader>00000nab a22004452  4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">KrimDok#2020-09-30#B68D5833020D060396DD429D8EBCD716EEA4121B</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">DE-2619</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</controlfield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.1177/0887403419860899</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="b">ger</subfield>
<subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">2,1</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Nolasco, Claire Angelique</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Section 1983 Civil Liability Against Prison Officials and Dentists for Delaying Dental Care:</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Many prisoners enter correctional facilities in the United States with little history of good dental hygiene and even less history of access to dentists. Thus, the incarceration experience presents opportunities for inmates to receive quality dental care, often for the first time. Dental care delivered by correctional dentists is complicated, however, by the array of serious dental conditions and difficult to treat dental problems in clinical settings. These conditions exist within a legal environment that mandates adequate dental care be provided to prisoners by the state. This article examines prisoners’ Section 1983 lawsuits, claiming that delays in the delivery of dental care violate inmates’ federally guaranteed rights. The analysis focuses on what the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals have required of correctional officials and dentists in the form of dental care, concluding with nine best practices for correctional dental practitioners to follow to avoid Section 1983 liability.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">(DE-588)1212073452</subfield>
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Vaughn, Michael S.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8">
<subfield code="i">In: </subfield>
<subfield code="t">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1552-3594</subfield>
<subfield code="w">(DE-627)306656345</subfield>
<subfield code="g">31 (2019), 5, Seite 721-745</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-2619</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419860899</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403419860899</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="887" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Autor in der Zoterovorlage [Vaughn, Michael S.] maschinell zugeordnet</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ixzom</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">mkri</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">zota</subfield>
<subfield code="2">LOK</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="936" ind1="u" ind2="w">
<subfield code="d">31</subfield>
<subfield code="e">5</subfield>
<subfield code="h">721-745</subfield>
<subfield code="j">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="JOU" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="URL" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="ZID" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">435</subfield>
<subfield code="b">krimdok</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<record>
<leader>00000nab a22004452  4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">KrimDok#2020-09-30#19CD39DF3FA521AC7CD8594FE33EAFB98026D2C0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">DE-2619</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</controlfield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.1177/0887403419838029</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="b">ger</subfield>
<subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">2,1</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Bunting, Amanda M.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">The Impact of Policy Changes on Heroin and Nonmedical Prescription Opioid Use Among an Incarcerated Population in Kentucky, 2008 to 2016:</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">In response to the opioid epidemic, there have been several national- and state-level policies enacted. Consideration of how criminal justice–involved individuals are affected by such policies has received limited attention, despite disproportionately higher use among this population. Bivariate statistics examined yearly trends, and logistic regressions examined demographic correlates of nonmedical prescription opioid and heroin use among Kentucky inmates over an 8-year time span of important national and local policy changes (N = 34,542). Results indicate that among incarcerated individuals, prior use of heroin increased 204% from 2008 to 2016, with increases possibly linked to key policy changes associated with OxyContin reformulation and state implementation of a prescription drug monitoring program. The current incarcerated population had more severe use patterns when considering general population research. Consideration of criminal justice–involved populations is crucial to understanding and treating the opioid epidemic.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Victor, Grant</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Pike, Erika</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Staton, Michele</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Winston, Erin</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Pangburn, Kevin</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8">
<subfield code="i">In: </subfield>
<subfield code="t">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1552-3594</subfield>
<subfield code="w">(DE-627)306656345</subfield>
<subfield code="g">31 (2019), 5, Seite 746-762</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-2619</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419838029</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403419838029</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">mkri</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">zota</subfield>
<subfield code="2">LOK</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="936" ind1="u" ind2="w">
<subfield code="d">31</subfield>
<subfield code="e">5</subfield>
<subfield code="h">746-762</subfield>
<subfield code="j">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="JOU" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="URL" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="ZID" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">435</subfield>
<subfield code="b">krimdok</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<record>
<leader>00000nab a22004452  4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">KrimDok#2020-09-30#27E3583207FBF534103CE6739D3E3F1B97DBD61E</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">DE-2619</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</controlfield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.1177/0887403419864415</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="b">ger</subfield>
<subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">2,1</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">León, Maria</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">A Review of Recreation Requirements in U.S. Juvenile Justice Facilities:</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">In the United States, the mission of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention includes the development and implementation of prevention and intervention programs. While many of these initiatives include recreation, there remains no standard for recreation programs. The purpose of this study was to review the written authorities for each state to identify the minimum requirements for recreation programming in juvenile justice facilities. Among other discoveries, we found that across all states, there is not a shared definition of recreation, only 70% of states have daily mandatory minimums requirements, only 44% of states require youth be given time outside, and only 56% of states include justifications for denying youth access to recreation. Implications for professionals and researchers are discussed, as well as suggestions for further inquiry and the integration of recreation into the treatment process.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Outley, Corliss</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Marchbanks, Miner</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Kelly Pryor, Brandy</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8">
<subfield code="i">In: </subfield>
<subfield code="t">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1552-3594</subfield>
<subfield code="w">(DE-627)306656345</subfield>
<subfield code="g">31 (2019), 5, Seite 763-782</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-2619</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419864415</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403419864415</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">mkri</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">zota</subfield>
<subfield code="2">LOK</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="936" ind1="u" ind2="w">
<subfield code="d">31</subfield>
<subfield code="e">5</subfield>
<subfield code="h">763-782</subfield>
<subfield code="j">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="JOU" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="URL" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="ZID" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">435</subfield>
<subfield code="b">krimdok</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<record>
<leader>00000nab a22004452  4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">KrimDok#2020-09-30#1CB0DF567E1F1E520D21F5C501DC1DAD60A5CCCC</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">DE-2619</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</controlfield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.1177/0887403419864709</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="b">ger</subfield>
<subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield>
<subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">2,1</subfield>
<subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Fisher, Blair</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Book Review: Nancy E. Marion, Drug Policy and the Criminal Justice System:</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7">
<subfield code="a">Rezension</subfield>
<subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049712-4</subfield>
<subfield code="0">(DE-627)106186019</subfield>
<subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Witherow, Kathryn</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Kruis, Nathan E.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8">
<subfield code="i">In: </subfield>
<subfield code="t">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1552-3594</subfield>
<subfield code="w">(DE-627)306656345</subfield>
<subfield code="g">31 (2019), 5, Seite 783-788</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">DE-2619</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419864709</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
<subfield code="u">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403419864709</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">mkri</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">zota</subfield>
<subfield code="2">LOK</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="936" ind1="u" ind2="w">
<subfield code="d">31</subfield>
<subfield code="e">5</subfield>
<subfield code="h">783-788</subfield>
<subfield code="j">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="JOU" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Criminal justice and behavior : official publication of the American Association of Correctional Psychology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="URL" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="ZID" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">435</subfield>
<subfield code="b">krimdok</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>

[socheres]

@mtrojan-ub wenn du mein Repository auf B-NU einbindest und der Docker von mir neu aufgebaut werden kann, werde ich dieses Issue als Testfall nutzen. Wenn es soweit ist, bitte das Label "ready for Testing" hinzufügen.

[mtrojan-ub]

Da benu jetzt zur Verfügung steht => ready for testing

[kdr154]

Zunächst eine Frage zum Verständnis. Was ist benu? ub28...? In beiden Fällen, auf nu und auf ub28 ist das Ergebnis nicht korrekt. Auf beiden Plattformen steht 2019 statt 2020 in 773 und 936:

[mtrojan-ub]

Im zotaut Regelmeeting besprochen:

• Unterschied benu+nu ist bekannt
• Tests erfolgen derzeit vorwiegend auf benu
• Benu-Änderungen an Translators greifen für BSZ-Lieferungen erst, wenn sie auf nu eingespielt wurden (hierfür ist ein Pull Request von @socheres an die FID-Entwicklung notwendig).

[socheres]

bitte auf benu testen.

[IxKo]

Im aktuellen Heft (https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjpa/31/9) gibt es zwei Artikel, die "First Published" 2019 worden. Beide werden beim Testen auf Benu mit 2020 sowohl als Berichts- und Erscheinungsjahr datiert - also so wie wir uns geeinigt hatten (#1078). Demnach könnte das Issue geschlossen werden, falls @kdr154 nicht noch etwas auffällt. Soll die Zs dann produktiv bzw. zotaw gestellt werden?

[kdr154]

Ich sehe im Augenblick auch keine Probleme.

[kdr154]

Auf nu keine Abweichungen mehr. Überall wird das Berichtsjahr genommen.