search

ubuntu-mate / mate-dock-applet

application dock for the MATE panel
GNU General Public License v3.0
125 stars 33 forks source link

stopped working #191

Open padreputativo opened 4 years ago

padreputativo commented 4 years ago

Since last update in Manjaro its stopped working... I cant solve it using an older version or reinstalling it... I think it must be some corrupted configuration or something like that...

Logs show:

23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_xml.py", line 417, in read_app_xml 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_xml.py", line 417, in read_app_xml 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: results = dock_xml.read_app_xml("%s/app_match.xml" % d) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 1155, in read_app_match 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 558, in init 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: the_dock = dock.Dock(applet) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 612, in applet_fill 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 695, in applet_factory 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_xml.py", line 417, in read_app_xml 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: results = dock_xml.read_app_xml("%s/app_match.xml" % d) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 1155, in read_app_match 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 558, in init 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: the_dock = dock.Dock(applet) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 612, in applet_fill 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 695, in applet_factory 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_xml.py", line 417, in read_app_xml 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: results = dock_xml.read_app_xml("%s/app_match.xml" % d) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 1155, in read_app_match 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 558, in init 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: the_dock = dock.Dock(applet) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 612, in applet_fill 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 695, in applet_factory 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_xml.py", line 417, in read_app_xml 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: results = dock_xml.read_app_xml("%s/app_match.xml" % d) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 1155, in read_app_match 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock.py", line 558, in init 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: the_dock = dock.Dock(applet) 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 612, in applet_fill 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: File "/usr/lib/mate-applets/mate-dock-applet/dock_applet.py", line 695, in applet_factory 23:30:18 dbus-daemon: [session uid=1000 pid=693] Successfully activated service 'org.mate.panel.applet.DockAppletFactory' 23:29:54 dbus-daemon: [session uid=1000 pid=693] Activating service name='org.mate.panel.applet.DockAppletFactory' requested by ':1.12' (uid=1000 pid=755 comm="mate-panel ") 23:29:51 mate-session: WARNING: Unable to find provider '' of required component 'dock'

tari01 commented 4 years ago

I think this is related to issue #187

padreputativo commented 4 years ago

I think this script is dead... Time for a fork?

CodyRude commented 4 years ago

Assuming your on Python 3.8, you could try my fork. On Arch it requires the python-distro package to be installed. I'm guessing Manjaro has that package too.

https://github.com/CodyRude/mate-dock-applet

tari01 commented 4 years ago

@CodyRude, I think you should request this to be merged into master

CodyRude commented 4 years ago

I made a PR, #188 , as far as I know it's up the repository owners to accept it