Closed expede closed 2 years ago
ECDSA -> NIST
Not all ECDSA are suspected of being cooked! For instance: secp256k1
.
But yes I think we should support the NIST curves & secp256k1
as next steps :ok_hand:
Ah, you're right. The NIST curves are the only ones called "ECDSA" in the WebCrypto API, so I had them too broadly indexed in my brain
secp256k1
Yes, that's a great idea
ECDSA is widely suspected of being "cooked", but it's so widely used that it should be available for those that have use cases and know what they're doing. I'd like to put a warning on it, but as an example, short lived ECDSA UCANs running inside an intranet are probably fine.
@dholms thoughts?