search

ucd-cws / calvin-network-data

Data to provide a default instance of the CALVIN DB
6 stars 9 forks source link

Updated CALVIN Database #51

Closed msdogan closed 8 years ago

msdogan commented 9 years ago

I have updated Node Names (and PRM Names), Link Names, and Inflow Name based on our naming convention. Now we use "-" only for links to connect two nodes, and "-" is eliminated from Node Names. Here is the link to updated CALVIN Engine (Database):

X:\calvin\CALVIN_PP_Update\0.CALVIN_Engine_10272015 VP_MSD

There is a few more changes we have made in the past weeks in addition to naming:

Please let me know if there is any issue with the updated database. If you are ok with changes, I can the model and provide you with output DSS file.

qjhart commented 9 years ago

@msdogan Sounds good. I checked it out, and I can programmatically change the name on this side, (for the node locations), and everything looks good. Minor PRMName change EXTRedding => EXT_Reddin and INT as well. But yes, let's get that output run. Then reassign this issue to me.

qjhart commented 9 years ago

Also, be sure to give it a good version name.

msdogan commented 9 years ago

Yes, I renamed Urban Redding as EXT_Reddin and INT_Reddin just to be consistent with other urban labels, although I had to eliminate "g" at the end. Here is the link to the updated CALVIN run. It's named as S09I05. X:\calvin\CALVIN_PP_Update\Runs\S09I05

qjhart commented 9 years ago

@msdogan so I've been looking at the sinks a bit more, and I have some questions about some of the output data. I see a number of sinks (mostly on WWP) that seem to have sinks, but no flows in the output. 

  prmname

WWP205-Sink_G19 WWP208-Sink_G23 WWP209-Sink_G24 WWP301-SinkG25 WWP304-SinkG26 WWP502-Sink_G33 WWP504-Sink_G37 WWP505-Sink_G40 WWP506-Sink_G44 WWP507-Sink_G45 WWP509-Sink_G48 WWP511-Sink_G50 WWP406-Sink_SBSLO WWP501-Sink_G30 WWP503-Sink_WWP50 WWP508-Sink_WWTP5

These get added to the WWP as sinks to those nodes, but with no flow.

prmname description type
WWP503 NOB
WWP507 SW Discharge to ?? NOB
WWP501 NOB
WWP208 Contra Costa NOB
WWP508 NOB
WWP511 SW Discharge to Ocean NOB
WWP502 SW Discharge to ?? NOB
WWP504 SW Discharge to Ocean NOB
WWP205 Napa Solano NOB
WWP209 East Bay MUD NOB
WWP509 SW discharge to Ocean NOB
WWP505 SW Discharge to evap NOB
WWP301 San Francisco waste NOB
WWP506 SW Discharge to ocean via local streams NOB
WWP304 Santa Clara waste NOB

Similarly,the sink

  prmname

C62-Sink_C62

Has no flow. Finally, the WWP406 gets assigned to the wrong location, because the type for that node doesn't match the others.

prmname type
... ...
WWP401 Water Treatment
WWP402 Junction
WWP403 Water Treatment
WWP405 Water Treatment
WWP406 Junction
WWP407 Water Treatment
... ...
prmname description type
INT_SB_SLO-WWP406 SB-SLO outflow to ocean NOB
C62-C64 Friant-Kern Canal Losses EQT
qjhart commented 9 years ago

@msdogan also, there is one calibration node with flow still. CN2-N201

prmname ymd val
CN2-N201 1924-09-30 6.604
CN2-N201 1924-10-31 5.239
CN2-N201 1931-09-30 4.348
CN2-N201 1931-10-31 6.691
CN2-N201 1988-09-30 3.108
CN2-N201 1988-10-31 5.719
qjhart commented 9 years ago

@msdogan There seem to be two DSS filename mismatches: The value for UpperBoundPathname = _/HEXT2014/HXI305_EXT: CVPM12/FLOWUBT(KAF)-TARG//1MON/EB SOUTH UPDATE/ doesn't match the DSS file for link HXI305-Ext_CVPM12.

And the Constrained Flow pathname for link 'N201-Sink_N201' /HEXT2014/N201_SINK N201/FLOW_LOC(KAF)//1MON/CALSIM - D290+D292/ is not found in the DSS file

msdogan commented 9 years ago

@qjhart First I am going to start with Sinks. I have checked a few of sinks (WWP205-Sink, WWP208-Sink, WWP209-Sink, and C62-Sink_C62) but there seems to be some flow in the output file (S09I05.DSS). These are mostly discharges to ocean (end of model), so there is no bound. CALVIN dynamically decides how much to discharge.

C62-Sink represents canal losses on Friant-Kern Canal. Yes it is a constrained flow (EQT). I gues based on your sink representation, it was assigned to link C62-C64.

I am going to update WWP402 and WWP406. Their type should be "water treatment plant node" instead of junction.

For calibration flows, yes I added those to make mass balance work. It's on Bear River watershed. I tried all other methods but without those calibration flows, results got infeasible. So, I ended up adding some calibration flow in some months.

For the pathname on link HXI305-EXT_CVPM12. Is what is not matching part B information? If so, we should have this for other ag and urban regions as well. Because I only updated node names and labels and link labels. I did not update paths that match the DSS file. But it would take some time but I can try if it is needed.

For N201-Sink_N201, I was able to locate /HEXT2014/N201_SINK N201/FLOW_LOC(KAF)//1MON/CALSIM - D290+D292/ in S09I05TS.DSS file. Would there be another problem?