Closed rkingdc closed 8 years ago
The row should be there if it runs the Tukey test. It is an error if not.
I deleted the Tukey 1df Test for the split-plot RCBD example (see pull request), as I think we should only use it for the basic RCBD with a single treatment rep per block.
In the ANOVA table output, we also get the error
Error in MEEM(object, conLin, control$niterEM) :
Singularity in backsolve at level 0, block 1
I'm pretty sure this has to do with the data not being nested but the model is trying to analyze it as if the data are nested. I'll need to implement an error handler that is more informative for this issue.
@msimmond I just want to confirm that we don't want to run the tukey test for split plot designs?
That's correct.
@msimmond Tukey 1-df test is for 2-way ANOVA only, correct? So should we only be doing this for RCBD2 and CRD2?
Tukey 1-df test is for the RCBD tests only (i.e. RCBD1 and RCBD2). Not for any CRD or split-plot.
Maegen Simmonds Postdoctoral Scholar Earth Systems Science Stanford University Green Blg, Rm 321 Stanford, CA 94305 Phone: (707) 694-6079 mbsimmonds@stanford.edu
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Ian K. Kyle notifications@github.com wrote:
@msimmond https://github.com/msimmond Tukey 1-df test is for 2-way ANOVA only, correct? So should we only be doing this for RCBD2 and CRD2?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ucd-ipo/aip-analysis/issues/90#issuecomment-218327707
fixed
Using the following parameters,
Data: split-plot design Experimental Design: Split-Plot RCBD DV: yield IVs: main plot treatment: A sub plot treatment: plot blocking factor variable: block Transformations: None
Under Tukey's Test for Nonadditivity, a message says to "refer to only the 'yield.pred.sq' row in this table...", but there is no such row in the table. Only a row for 'A', 'plot', and 'Residuals'. Is this an error?