Update Source priority order

[qjhart]

The current source priority order used in our system is

    ("verified-manual" 1) ("epmc" 2) ("pubmed" 3)  ("scopus" 4)("wos" 5) ("wos-lite" 6)
    ("crossref" 7)  ("dimensions" 8) ("arxiv" 9)("orcid" 10) ("dblp" 11)
    ("cinii-english" 12) ("repec" 13)  ("figshare" 14)  ("cinii-japanese" 15)
    ("manual" 16)  ("dspace" 17) 

This is problematic, because epmc is often wrong, especially in authors. For example look at this publication where epmc not only doesn't link all authors, the authors are out of order. I propose this new ordering, prioritizing dimensions, and moving epmc back down the list.

    ("verified-manual" 1)("dimensions" 2)("pubmed" 3)("scopus" 4)("wos" 5)
    ("wos-lite" 6)("crossref" 7)("epmc" 8)("arxiv" 9)("orcid" 10)("dblp" 11)
    ("cinii-english" 12)("repec" 13)("figshare" 14)
    ("cinii-japanese" 15)("manual" 16)("dspace" 17) }

[qjhart]

@Vensberg, I'm pretty sure that you've noticed this issue as well. Let me know if you want the order arranged differently.

[qjhart]

@Vensberg I am reopening this, since you seemed to mention a record source that is not in this? If you want any changes add to this comment, assign me and send a note, otherwise you can just close again.

[qjhart]

@Vensberg I guess you were say repec, so I've modified to this:

           VALUES (?source ?order) {
            ("verified-manual" 1)("repec" 2)("dimensions" 3)("pubmed" 4)
             ("scopus" 5)("wos" 6) ("wos-lite" 7)("crossref" 8)("epmc" 9)
             ("arxiv" 10)("orcid" 11)("dblp" 12)
             ("cinqii-english" 13)("figshare" 14)
             ("cinii-japanese" 15)("manual" 16)("dspace" 17) }