Closed brettfazio closed 3 years ago
Going off of this is a loan really a good category to have? Seems confusing from a user's POV
these were taken from plaid we could perhaps alias them i guess
I think we can consider aliasing them to make them more accessible terms
What if we had descriptions for them?
ok this issue will now be about changing the names
Going off of this is a loan really a good category to have? Seems confusing from a user's POV
we now use the Loan type... should we remove it or keep it?
let account_class = match a.account_type.as_str() {
"depository" => AssetClass::Cash,
"credit" => AssetClass::Loan,
"loan" => AssetClass::Loan,
"investment" => AssetClass::Equity, // for now classify all investments as broad equities
_ => AssetClass::Cash,
};
im not too sure, but what do you think the chance is the user has a loan out to someone else, probably low
im not too sure, but what do you think the chance is the user has a loan out to someone else, probably low
haha is that what it meant? cause i thought it meant the user owes someone else money
i guess going off how we dont consider credit and loans for net worth in snapshot, we may as well exclude it from allocations ?
im not really sure, but since we have it as a part of asset class it has to be a positive for the user?
if they do have a 'loan' its likely just a bond (in which case we have a category for that)
then we shall nix it
people may not know what equity means