Differences in rendering lists between editor and viewer

[zachberry]

Shown in this example (Note the bullets):

Editor:

Viewer:

Here's the XML:

<List id="d7516e68-3583-4562-9b31-ec6fea836b53">
    <listStyles>
        <type>ordered</type>
        <indents>
            <indent level="0" type="ordered" bulletStyle="decimal"/>
            <indent level="1" type="ordered" bulletStyle="upper-alpha"/>
            <indent level="2" type="ordered" bulletStyle="upper-roman"/>
            <indent level="3" type="ordered" bulletStyle="decimal"/>
            <indent level="4" type="ordered" bulletStyle="upper-alpha"/>
            <indent level="5" type="ordered" bulletStyle="decimal"/>
            <indent level="6" type="ordered" bulletStyle="lower-alpha"/>
            <indent level="7" type="ordered" bulletStyle="lower-roman"/>
        </indents>
    </listStyles>
    <textGroup>
        <t indent="3" hangingIndent="false">1 List Level 1</t>
        <t indent="1" hangingIndent="false">A List Level 2</t>
        <t indent="6" hangingIndent="false">a Li    st Level 3</t>
        <t indent="3" hangingIndent="false">1 List Level</t>
        <t indent="7" hangingIndent="false">i List Level 5</t>
        <t indent="3" hangingIndent="false">2 Back to Level 4</t>
        <t indent="0" hangingIndent="false">1 Back to Level 1</t>
    </textGroup>
</List>

[jpeterson976]

Did some digging around in the code, figured out what's causing the viewer to display lists differently. With the way that lists are created in viewer-component.js, if a line is more than one indentation level ahead of the previous one it will still create the list elements in between, they just get hidden, so items further down the list may have unexpected numbering. Commenting out the line of code that hides the list element shows the secret hidden structure of the list.

[stale[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. We do this to keep our backlog under control, but we thank you for your contributions.

[stale[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. We do this to keep our backlog under control, but we thank you for your contributions.