uchicago-computation-workshop / Spring2024

Spring Workshop 2024, Thursdays 9:30-11:50am
2 stars 0 forks source link

Questions for Xuechunzi Bai concern her 5/2 talk on "Multidimensional Stereotypes Emerge Spontaneously When Exploration is Costly" #5

Open jamesallenevans opened 3 weeks ago

jamesallenevans commented 3 weeks ago

Post questions here for Xuechunzi Bai regarding her 5/2 talk Multidimensional Stereotypes Emerge Spontaneously When Exploration is Costly. Stereotypes of social groups have a canonical multidimensional structure, reflecting the extent to which groups are considered competent and trustworthy. Traditional explanations for stereotypes – group motives, cognitive biases, minority/majority environments, or real-group differences – assume that they result from deficits in humans or their environments. A recently-proposed alternative explanation – that stereotypes can emerge when exploration is costly – posits that even optimal decision-makers in an ideal environment can inadvertently create incorrect impressions. However, existing theories fail to explain the multidimensionality of stereotypes. We show that multidimensional stratification and the associated stereotypes can result from feature-based exploration: when individuals make self-interested decisions based on past experiences in an environment where exploring new options carries an implicit cost, and when these options share similar attributes, they are more likely to separate groups along multiple dimensions. We formalize this theory via the contextual multi-armed bandit problem, use the resulting model to generate testable predictions, and evaluate those predictions against human behavior. In particular, we evaluate this process in incentivized decisions involving as many as 20 real jobs, and successfully recover the classic warmth-by-competence stereotype space. Further experiments show that intervening on the cost of exploration effectively mitigates bias, further demonstrating that exploration cost per se is the operating variable. Future diversity interventions may consider how to reduce exploration cost, such as introducing bonus rewards for diverse hires, assessing candidates using challenging tasks, and randomly making some groups unavailable for selection. Read the following manuscript: BaiGriffithsFiske.pdf

bhavyapan commented 3 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing your work. It is fascinating! I was just wondering about some of its larger theoretical implications and contextual generalizability -- how could models of stereotype formation through costly exploration integrate with or challenge existing psychological theories of stereotype development, particularly those emphasizing cognitive biases or social motivations? How generalizable could these findings be to other contexts where stereotypes might emerge, such as in education or social networking? What specific strategies could be recommended for organizations or social systems to reduce the cost of exploration and thereby potentially mitigate the formation of harmful stereotypes?

XiaotongCui commented 3 weeks ago

Very interesting topic! I wonder does multidimensionality of stereotypes' structure vary across different social and cultural contexts? Thanks!

Kevin2330 commented 3 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing!

How do the predictions generated by your model compare with observed human behaviors in real-world scenarios? Could you provide some examples where the model's predictions were particularly accurate or inaccurate?

C-y22 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing this work! The paper discusses a computational model that simulates decision-making scenarios involving hiring different groups for various jobs. Could this model be effectively adapted to explore other types of social decision-making scenarios beyond hiring to better understand stereotype formation in these contexts as well?

KekunH commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing. My questions are: how well do the predictions generated by your model align with observed human behaviors in real-world scenarios, and could this model be versatile enough to explore a range of social decision-making scenarios to enhance our understanding of stereotype formation in these contexts?

yuzhouw313 commented 2 weeks ago

Hello Professor Bai, thank you for sharing your work! I am very intrigued by your use of contextual multiarmed bandit task, specifically why do you choose this target method to simulate the behavior of adaptive-decision agents and what other potential treatment tasks we could consider for the simulation of the emergence of multidimensional stereotypes and their implications for decision-making processes when exploration is costly?

Hai1218 commented 2 weeks ago

Professor Bai, thank you for coming to our workshop. Considering the complexity of social perceptions that may extend beyond the binary dimensions of warmth and competence, could your model integrate additional factors to capture these subtleties more comprehensively? How might your research help organizations leverage this expanded understanding to more effectively address biases, particularly in workplace settings where perceptions of warmth and competence might significantly influence career opportunities and team dynamics?

HongzhangXie commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you very much for sharing the interesting research. The study on the relationship between exploration costs and stereotypes make me think the search in marketing. When consumers search for products, if the search cost is high, and the potential utility gains from exploring new products (such as lower prices or higher quality) cannot offset these costs, consumers will stop exploring and choose products that are not optimal for them.

Your research has been very inspiring to me. In the case of consumers, we can conveniently define a utility function to quantitatively analyze the potential losses from ceasing exploration. In the stereotypes study, is there a way we can measure the losses caused by using stereotypes and find a equilibrium between exploration costs and stereotypes in the strategy?

ecg1331 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you so much for sharing your research! I thought this was really interesting, because we are often hearing about how technology can increase bias and stereotypes, and rarely hear the opposite. I'm wondering if you could see these findings being integrated into things (like hiring processes) to counteract this.

kexinz330 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing your research! I'm curious as to how organizations may practically implement the interventions (such as exploration bonus, lower reward rate, random holdout) you propose in your paper into practice to minimize stereotype formation in their hiring processes or resource allocation?

lbitsiko commented 2 weeks ago

In the Discussion section, you mention that the model offers a "psychological analog of fairness" in AI. Could you expand on this? Also, could you discuss the premises of using a "rewards" framework in the model?

wenyizhaomacss commented 2 weeks ago

Professor Bai, thanks for sharing your work. In your study on how costly exploration leads to multidimensional stereotypes, you utilized the contextual multi-armed bandit model to simulate decision-making processes. Could you discuss the assumptions and limitations of this computational model in capturing the complexity of real-world human social interactions? How might improvements or variations in the model enhance our understanding of stereotype formation and mitigation in diverse social settings?

hchen0628 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you very much for sharing! Considering the theoretical and methodological discussions in the study, which uses a feature-based exploration cost model to explain the emergence of multidimensional stereotypes, how does this model perform in empirical validation? Specifically, how can we ensure that the model does not overfit specific samples and lose generalizability when dealing with real-world data?

alejandrosarria0296 commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing this paper! This was my first exposition to a multidimensional approach to stereotype formation and I'm fascinated by it. I'm curious about how different facotrs may be relevant for the different dimension of stereotype formation. In your paper you talk cost of exploration, what other factors could be relevant in this process?

fabrice401 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing this interesting work! My question is: how might the proposed interventions for reducing exploration costs, such as offering bonuses for diversity or imposing random hiring restrictions, be adapted and implemented in real-world corporate settings to help mitigate bias and promote more equitable hiring practices?

iefis commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing your research! As a follow-up to the main finding, what social and cultural factors constitute the exploration costs, and what are the most decisive factors that could help reduce such costs?

zhian21 commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the interesting work! Given the study's findings on the impact of exploration costs on stereotype formation and the effectiveness of certain interventions, what specific strategies could organizations implement to reduce exploration costs in real-world hiring practices, and how might these strategies be tailored to different industry contexts to maximize their effectiveness in promoting diversity and reducing biases?

zihua-uc commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing your work! Perhaps this phenomenon might be heavily dependent on the context - job industry, country, etc. How representative are the real jobs you explore to the world generally? Is there a high level takeaway that we can generalize to our experiences in the world?

nourabdelbaki commented 2 weeks ago

Hi Xuechunzi, thank you for sharing your work! I loved reading the paper. I am more curious about the workflow between simulations and experiments. Could you walk us through how you came up with each on its own and how to bridge/use them together to further advance your research? What's the best way of approaching similar projects?

ethanjkoz commented 2 weeks ago

These are some very interesting findings, thank you for sharing your work. I was wondering if you could further elaborate on the complementing proposed mechanisms for stereotype origins. More concretely, I was curious if you could clarify how lack of exploration differs from confirmation bias as I am still left unclear about this difference? Furthermore, other than time or money, what other factors contribute to exploration costs?

yunfeiavawang commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing! It's interesting to learn the stereotype formation process from a multidimensional perspective! My question is how your model contributes to addressing stereotyping and discrimination in real-world settings. Could people be more aware of their tendency of stereotyping after knowing this research, and then try to reduce the bias?

lguo7 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing this research! I have a question for the significant effect of 'social network size' on 'risk perception' but not on 'behavioral changes'. Could you discuss possible psychological or sociological reasons why 'social network size' might affect perceptions of risk but not actual behavior changes?

shaangao commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing your research, Bai! Great seeing some evidence that stereotypes are related to the cost of exploration. I wonder if the effect of exploration on reducing stereotypes will deteriorate as time lapses and as we intake additional stereotype-forming information in the larger world -- after all, that's the reason why stereotypes arise in the first place.

Daniela-miaut commented 2 weeks ago

Your research is so inspiring! I wonder that concerning the comparison with traditional explanations for stereotypes, is it possible to theorize that the traditional factors mainly play a role in the formation of stereotypical ideas, while the variation in the costliness of exploration explains how stereotypes result in concrete behaviors of discrimination?

Jessieliao2001 commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for your interesting sharing! I have a question regarding the multidimensional stereotypes. How does the concept of exploration cost contribute to the spontaneous emergence of multidimensional stereotypes, and how can interventions targeting the cost of exploration mitigate bias in decision-making processes?

MaxwelllzZ commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you Prof. Bai. Could you elaborate on how reducing the cost of exploration might be implemented in real-world settings to mitigate biases? For example, what specific strategies might be most effective in diverse hiring practices to counteract stereotype formation?

jinyz1220 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing your work. My question is: how do personal characteristics, particularly perceived similarities or differences to oneself, influence the formation and reinforcement of stereotypes across various dimensions beyond just competence and warmth?

HamsterradYC commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing your research! Your article discusses modeling stereotypes with computational models and behavioral experiments, particularly under high exploration costs. While effective in controlled settings, real-world scenarios are more dynamic. How do you plan to adapt this framework for broader, real-world applications? Considering the role of AI and filtering systems in reinforcing biases and stratification, what strategies do you suggest to mitigate these effects?

yuhanwang7 commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing your research. How might the findings of the paper suggest strategies or interventions that could be implemented in organizational settings to reduce the emergence of costly exploration-driven stereotypes and improve decision-making processes?

zhuoqingli526 commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing your research. In your study, you mention that reducing the cost of exploration can effectively mitigate stereotypes. I'm curious to know if there are specific strategies or methods that can more effectively reduce exploration costs in practical applications. Additionally, do these strategies vary in their effectiveness when implemented in different types of organizations, such as small businesses versus large multinational corporations?

isaduan commented 2 weeks ago

Very cool study! The simulation makes lots of assumption based the rules of the games and how agents behave. What assumptions you think may be challenged in various real-world scenario?

Caojie2001 commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing your interesting research! I wonder how can the theoretical framework of exploration cost be applied to explain the evolution of stereotypes over extended historical periods, particularly in response to major historical events?

ksheng-UChicago commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing. It is impressive to see how Multidimensional Stereotypes can affect people's working experience. I wonder if the recent trend of working from home and hybrid working has influenced people's perception of Multidimensional Stereotypes, since people interact less often under such circumstances.

jialeCharloote commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing! I wonder if there is any heterogeneity across different individuals in terms of this kind of effect?

Marugannwg commented 2 weeks ago

Early on positive results in choice may hinder the exploration when exploration has a cost ---> leading to stereotypes. This is a strong and intuitive theory, and I really appreciate how the paper and presentation illustrate this vividly and highlight the implication of creating stereotypes and stratification in the real world.

Something I'm looking for clarification: Is this something inevitable due to individual-level path dependence?

natashacarpcast commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the research! How do you think the recommendation of encouraging exploration can be truly implemented in real life without being too costly?

essicaJ commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing! My question is: What interventions are suggested for reducing the cost of exploration? How might these interventions help in mitigating bias in real-world scenarios, such as hiring? Thanks!

YucanLei commented 2 weeks ago

I must ask, I am still really confused on how implicit biases can be really quantified or measured at all. After all, it is difficult to even categorize what is implicit bias or simply a question with no malicious intent at all.

jingzhixu commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the talk, just wondering about the experiment computation and time cost to replicate a similar study with multi-arm bandit model. And also how you may justify the cost of debiasing verses the potential benefit?

Aiwen-Xiao commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing your insightful research. In your study, you've utilized the contextual multi-armed bandit model to examine how costly exploration leads to the formation of multidimensional stereotypes. Could you elaborate on the assumptions and limitations of this computational model in capturing the complexity of real-world human social interactions? Additionally, how might variations or improvements in the model help us better understand stereotype formation and mitigation in diverse social settings?

ana-yurt commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing your research! I was curious how broadly feature-based exploration applies to real-life scenarios, for example, outside goal-oriented tasks like hiring.

Joycepeiting commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing the insights! I would like to know more about whether some heterogeneity exists in the effects and how would you propose to do in terms of interventions to make better interventions to foster diverse working environment.

YutaoHeOVO commented 2 weeks ago

Hi,

I love the idea of multidimensional stereotypes (especially in multidimensional situation, where we might fall in to the curse of dimensionality due to insufficient data). However, I am thinking of the possibility that it might be some 'unobserved' fixed effects which cannot efficiently estimated due to data problem. Moreover, intuitively, there are methods that we can explore such unobserved heterogeneity with long panel data. Could we interpret this project as inefficient estimation of fixed effects emerging as stereotypes? (This might make the research project result really trivial; I am afraid.)

Best, Yutao He

hantaoxiao commented 2 weeks ago

How does the theory that multidimensional stereotypes arise from costly exploration apply to everyday social interactions? Can you provide practical examples where this theory is observable? What are the strengths and limitations of using the contextual multi-armed bandit problem to model the formation of stereotypes? How well does this model translate to complex human behaviors?

QichangZheng commented 2 weeks ago

In this research, the theory that multidimensional stereotypes arise from costly exploration is examined using the contextual multi-armed bandit model. This computational approach provides insights into how stereotypes form in social interactions, but it's important to consider the model's assumptions and limitations in capturing the full complexity of human behavior. How might this research contribute to addressing real-world stereotyping and discrimination, and could increased awareness of the stereotype formation process help individuals actively reduce their biases?

yunshu3112 commented 2 weeks ago

Hi Prof. Bai, I found this research very appealing and I wonder how do you expect the findings to be applied to contexts other than hiring? Thank you!

kunkunz111 commented 2 weeks ago

Professor Bai, your work on using contextual multiarmed bandit tasks to simulate adaptive-decision agents is quite fascinating. Given the complexities of social perceptions beyond binary dimensions such as warmth and competence, could your model incorporate additional factors to capture these subtleties more comprehensively? Furthermore, in practical applications like consumer behavior where exploration costs might deter optimal product selection, how could organizations leverage your findings to mitigate biases and stereotype formation in decision-making processes, particularly in areas like hiring and resource allocation? What other potential treatment tasks could we consider to more effectively address these issues in both theoretical and applied settings?

xinyi030 commented 2 weeks ago

Hi Prof. Bai, thanks for sharing your work. Future diversity interventions are suggested, such as assessing candidates through challenging tasks or randomly making some groups unavailable for selection. How do these interventions directly address the multidimensional nature of stereotypes, and are there other mechanisms you would recommend?

66Alexa commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing! Your research suggests that multidimensional stereotypes can emerge even when decision-makers are optimal and the environment is ideal. Can you elaborate on the key factors that contribute to the formation of these stereotypes in such settings?

Dededon commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for your speech? I'm interested in what are the LLM's capacity to identify and explore the stereotypes?