Thanks for your interesting presentation!
The paper shows that groups in dynamic networks far outperform their best-performing member and that even the best member’s judgment substantially benefits from group engagement. I want to know what’s the distribution of performance improvement for each member in the group? Does low-performing individual benefit most and high-performing individual benefit least?
Good question. From Fig5, it seems that the worse performing individual benefits the most from being in a dynamic network.. this an interesting quantity of interest that we did not think of.
Thanks for your interesting presentation! The paper shows that groups in dynamic networks far outperform their best-performing member and that even the best member’s judgment substantially benefits from group engagement. I want to know what’s the distribution of performance improvement for each member in the group? Does low-performing individual benefit most and high-performing individual benefit least?