Hi,
Thanks for the paper! I am a little confused by the comparison in table 1. The metric used here put unsupervised learning methods at disadvantage, and the comparison is in favor of supervised learning methods. Though you have provided some explanation in the paper, can you further explain why this choice of metric won't change the result in a different direction? Thanks!
Hi, Thanks for the paper! I am a little confused by the comparison in table 1. The metric used here put unsupervised learning methods at disadvantage, and the comparison is in favor of supervised learning methods. Though you have provided some explanation in the paper, can you further explain why this choice of metric won't change the result in a different direction? Thanks!