Since it seems very likely to me that there may be many tablets and other forms of trade records that haven't been excavated or were not preserved to date, and the sample size is not very large, I'm wondering why the methods used in this paper can still produce relatively robust results?
Since it seems very likely to me that there may be many tablets and other forms of trade records that haven't been excavated or were not preserved to date, and the sample size is not very large, I'm wondering why the methods used in this paper can still produce relatively robust results?