So I am curious about how does polarized collaboration improve the quality of science articles. It seems that scientific facts have nothing to do with politics but the article gives a counter-intuitive conclusion. Could you give a possible explanation for this?
Thanks for presenting!
So I am curious about how does polarized collaboration improve the quality of science articles. It seems that scientific facts have nothing to do with politics but the article gives a counter-intuitive conclusion. Could you give a possible explanation for this?