uchicago-library / mlc_ucla

GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Test authentication for UCLA #28

Open dbietila opened 7 months ago

dbietila commented 7 months ago

In the Access menu:

Here are some things to check for with requesting authentication and access to Panopto recordings:

When testing Panopto player, remember to check your account privileges in Panopto The Panopto player should load:

vitorgomateus commented 7 months ago

"Request Access to this Series" should appear if the user is logged in and on a Series or Item page.

When a series requires access, but the user is not logged in, there is currently the same button "Request Access to this Series" but it triggers an alert informing of the need to an account. I can change it to have the message show directly under access instead of the button. The current solution seems to me visually cleaner. @dbietila can we keep this as it is?

dbietila commented 7 months ago

I think the current behavior is okay.

vitorgomateus commented 6 months ago

"Request Access to this Series" should appear if the user is logged in and on a Series or Item page.

Currently (following the lates changes with #32) this link only appears if the series is restricted, has an item with a panopto link. At an item level view, if the item itself doesn't have a panopto link, the link won't show. User auth status is detected at the request access page itself.

vitorgomateus commented 6 months ago

All the Series that I found with "Campus" status have no panopto link in their sound type items.

vitorgomateus commented 6 months ago

I'm not able to log in. @bufordrat do you know if this login link is wrong?
https://ucla.lib.uchicago.edu/Shibboleth.sso/Login?target=https://ucla.lib.uchicago.edu/ It's working on MLC https://mlc.lib.uchicago.edu/Shibboleth.sso/Login?target=https://mlc.lib.uchicago.edu/

bufordrat commented 6 months ago

Yeah, we had a big back and forth on this. The TDLR:

I'm still unclear on what all of the above means logistically re: our ability to test that the "soft-launch" production site is working. I would follow up with @dbietila to see what he recommends.