Closed czifan closed 4 years ago
Thanks for your interest.
It is the code for this paper. I took a look and it seems the code indeed generates 583 CTs. I will look into this problem and figure out which number is correct.
Thanks for your reply! Could you tell me the result of the problem if you solve it?
Thank you so much for the code! I have the same problem as @czifan, please let us know when it's settled.
Hello, I just double checked. There are a total of 583 CT scans that meet the criteria, however, just for sanity check, I added 3 more CT scans randomly (so a total of 586). But for evaluation, only the 583 CT scans were valid
Thank you very much!!!
Thanks for the open source code, which is so helpful for me! But I have a question about the dataset. I found that "resulting in a total number of 586 CT scans with 1131 nodules" in section "3 Result - Data and experiment configurations" of your paper. But I noticed that there are only 583 CT scans in the split folder in this code. In addition, I have preprocessed the data by following this readme.md and I only have 583 CT scans. Is the results in the paper on this dataset of this code? Because it will be a baseline for comparison and this question is important. Thank you!!!