Closed DerrickXuNu closed 2 years ago
This will make data consistent with our own vehicle. 64 is a little too dense
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 1:40 PM Hao Xiang @.***> wrote:
@.**** commented on this pull request.
In opencda/scenario_testing/config_yaml/v2xp_datadump_town06_carla.yaml https://github.com/ucla-mobility/OpenCDA/pull/133#discussion_r726555409:
@@ -31,15 +58,15 @@ vehicle_base: &vehicle_base camera_num: 4 # how many cameras are mounted on the vehicle. Maximum 3(frontal, left and right cameras) lidar_visualize: true # whether to visualize lidar points using open3d lidar: # lidar sensor configuration, check CARLA sensor reference for more details
- channels: 64
- channels: 32
what's the advantage of using 32?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ucla-mobility/OpenCDA/pull/133#pullrequestreview-776646756, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APFOSK6LYUMGJPSSNV2T6DLUGNDVDANCNFSM5FYZXC3Q .
This PR is ready for merging. Major changes: