uclahs-cds / project-method-AlgorithmEvaluation-BNCH-000082-SRCRNDSeed

GNU General Public License v2.0
1 stars 0 forks source link

Add Strelka-Batennberg-phyloWGS-sr submission script #98

Closed philsteinberg closed 1 year ago

philsteinberg commented 1 year ago

Description

Launch Strelka2 + Battenberg + PhyloWGS seeds [HSNC single-region] Seed + Sample combination that does not work due to mcmc number #56

Closes #56

Pipeline Run Results

Example

sample: ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F seed: 51404

input SNV (Strelka2): /hot/project/disease/HeadNeckTumor/HNSC-000084-LNMEvolution/data/SNV/strelka2/recsnv/vcfs/ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F.vcf

input CNA (Battenberg): /hot/project/disease/HeadNeckTumor/HNSC-000084-LNMEvolution/data/Battenberg/refit_dpnorm/ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F/ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F_cellularity_ploidy.txt /hot/project/disease/HeadNeckTumor/HNSC-000084-LNMEvolution/data/Battenberg/refit_dpnorm/ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F/ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F_subclones.txt

config: /hot/project/method/AlgorithmEvaluation/BNCH-000082-SRCRNDSeed/pipeline-call-src/run-strelka2-battenberg-phylowgs/input/config/seed_51404.config

yaml: /hot/project/method/AlgorithmEvaluation/BNCH-000082-SRCRNDSeed/pipeline-call-src/strelka2_battenberg_yamls/single-region/ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F.yaml

output: /hot/project/method/AlgorithmEvaluation/BNCH-000082-SRCRNDSeed/pipeline-call-src/run-strelka2-battenberg-phylowgs/output/call-SRC-1.0.0-rc.1/ILHNLNEV000001-T001-P01-F/PhyloWGS-2205be1/output/

logs: /hot/project/method/AlgorithmEvaluation/BNCH-000082-SRCRNDSeed/pipeline-call-src/run-strelka2-battenberg-phylowgs/logs/

witness data: /hot/project/method/AlgorithmEvaluation/BNCH-000082-SRCRNDSeed/pipeline-call-src/run-strelka2-battenberg-phylowgs/witness_results/

Checklist

philsteinberg commented 1 year ago

Looks good! Can you put an example of the MCMC number error in #56? Is it all due to #95?

Added an example log, and yes all of the failed pipelines errored due to Exception: 100% of trees are multiprimary (2500 of 2500), so not enough to report good posterior. as stated in #95