Is duplicate 'value' property necessary

[noelmcloughlin]

Currently types:DictionaryEntry uses property types:value instead of core:value and I wondered if that was intentional or necessary since typically its best to avoid clashing classnames and propertynames and core:value should be sufficient.

i.e. here is conflicting propertynames

types:value
        a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
        rdfs:label "value"@en ;
        rdfs:comment "A specific property value."@en ;
        rdfs:range xsd:string ;
        .

core:value
        a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
        rdfs:label "value"@en ;
        rdfs:comment "A string value."@en ;
        rdfs:range xsd:string ;

[noelmcloughlin]

The following is a list of properties which appear in more than one UCO subproject.

• cpeid
• creator
• endTime
• index
• object
• references
• startTime
• swid
• value
• version

[ajnelson-nist]

Thank you for the question, @noelmcloughlin , and sorry for the delay in replying.

We'll discuss this in the Ontology Committees meeting next Tuesday.