[ ] Initial scope discussion: [ link to ticket if there is one] this seems to be something we often do which is helpful, but which makes the initial ticket very long and potentially confusing
Acceptance criteria is this the right thing to call this?
[function] I think this might be optional & repeatable depending on the project, for different components of the functionality like the batch edit which has two separate pieces export + overlay
[ ] spec written, reviewed , and finalized. [link to ticket]
[ ] code written. [link to ticket]
[ ] testing and updating on QA server. [link to ticket] or should this be part of the code item above, perhaps using "review requested" to DOMM (or whomever) prior to a MR?
[ ] deployed and tested on production server. [link to ticket]
Brief description
[brief description]
Acceptance criteria is this the right thing to call this?
[function] I think this might be optional & repeatable depending on the project, for different components of the functionality like the batch edit which has two separate pieces export + overlay
? anything else ?