Closed samgdotson closed 5 months ago
In reviewing the code again I see this assumption which I'm a bit concerned about: "However, if we assume that temperature has no effect on panel performance, then the output power and incident power are linearly related." With rising temperatures and more solar on the grid, ignoring the reduction in solar output on hot summer days will distort the model. Should we address this?
Average temperatures are rising, but for a first order model (which is what we're trying to achieve right now), it doesn't make sense to incorporate. Even if we did, the effect would be quite small. We can circle back on this in the future though, if you think it's important.
Looks like there's about a 5% loss in performance going from panel rating temperature to 35 degC, the average high in Chicago (in July). During peak hours this could be significant, but I agree it's probably not worth including in the model at this point. It could be an interesting sensitivity to do later, possibly even incorporating future and extreme weather data.
This pull request closes #5 by adding solar and wind generators to the illinois model notebook. Included are the following
illinois_model.ipynb
notebook that explains the data manipulations (specifically, we just want the shape of the generation so it can be scaled by the optimal capacity, later).Currently, the solar and wind resources are only considered at a single point in each modeled region (the centroid). In the future, we may consider expanding the distribution of these resources by increasing the number of buses, for example (each bus does not have to have a load).
Edit: This PR also directly adds the relevant datasets.