The quizzes were mostly obvious answers\, that required little thought\, once one figured out what was meant in the explanations in the videos.\
\
Explanations in some of the sections\, especially the ones on Likelihood Weighting and Gibbs Sampling\, were not done very well. For example\, I believe it is never said what what actually does with the weights. (This isn't hard\, but it needs to be explained here.) Also not explained is what is meant by a sampling method being "consistent."
cgearhart
commented
6 years ago
The quizzes were mostly obvious answers\, that required little thought\, once one figured out what was meant in the explanations in the videos.\ \ Explanations in some of the sections\, especially the ones on Likelihood Weighting and Gibbs Sampling\, were not done very well. For example\, I believe it is never said what what actually does with the weights. (This isn't hard\, but it needs to be explained here.) Also not explained is what is meant by a sampling method being "consistent."