Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
seems that there is a good balance at the moment. allowing pipeline to consume
all resources may not be best idea. isolating pipeline to 8 and 12 cores seems
to be working smoothly.
Original comment by zack...@gmail.com
on 23 Oct 2013 at 7:43
Issue 633 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by zack...@gmail.com
on 11 Dec 2013 at 8:28
at first I intended on rebalancing the sequencing pipelines to allow them to
consume all available node-types.
Later I changed my mind since given the many samples and parallel nature,
monopolizing the cluster is a real possibility in which case researchers with
high-perf needs (high mem,cpu) would be SOL for multiple days.
Original comment by zack...@gmail.com
on 11 Dec 2013 at 8:37
Original comment by zack...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2014 at 11:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
zack...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 10:43