search

uec / Issue.Tracker

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/usc-epigenome-center
0 stars 0 forks source link

"results" indicator comes up prematurely #703

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
For flowcell C3KPNACXX sample MAR1681A78 says "results" but all files/metrics 
aren't yet available

Original issue reported on code.google.com by cmnico...@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2014 at 4:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I can see fastq's for this sample. Where do you see "results"? In Run
column? I don't see "results" but I see the path in Run column. Issue
695<http://code.google.com/p/usc-epigenome-center/issues/detail?id=695>explains
why Run column displays path.

Original comment by natalia....@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2014 at 7:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
on the non beta site it shows up (or did this morning)

Original comment by cmnico...@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2014 at 7:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
ok, i see it. eccpgxt will display "results" because changes described in
Issue 695 are made only in eccpgxt-beta. I just logged in eccpgxt and I see
fastq's and analysis files.

Original comment by natalia....@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2014 at 7:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
yes but the other files and metrics are absent or N/A  I thought the whole
point of the "results" appearing, and the emails, was that they only
display when everything is in the interface.  That is not the case for  the
D0 sample but maybe I'm misunderstanding when things appear and when the
email goes out.

Original comment by cmnico...@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2014 at 8:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The "results" appear after the update script locates the available analysis
files for the first time. Ecdp doesnt "wait"  to display  "results" until
all analysis files are produced. Email is sent when the script locates the
analysis id csv file in analysis directory and the "age" of this file is
less then 24 hours.

Original comment by natalia....@gmail.com on 28 Mar 2014 at 12:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Thank you for explaining that.  We should discuss changing the trigger
perhaps, I think it makes more sense to not have results or the email sent
until everything is completed (with the possible exception of bissnp)

Original comment by cmnico...@gmail.com on 28 Mar 2014 at 3:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by natalia....@gmail.com on 19 Sep 2014 at 11:10