Closed jeremygiberson closed 7 years ago
Im definitely not opposed to this - but not sure if I have the bandwidth to look at doing it right now. Not sure if there is more interest from the community?
I'm happy to help with this. I'm willing to pull the code out into its own library and make a PR that requires the new package. I'll need you to fork it and submit it to packagist though so it stays under your vendor name. Once its available, I'll submit a pull request against qpush-bundle that drops the classes and requires the libraries.
In general, I would greatly welcome an abstraction layer for multiple queues and this bundle does just that [in addition to some other stuff]. I'd really like to see the queue Provider interface and the provider adapters for ironmq, aws, file, etc to be pulled out into a separate library(s).