Open NickSzapiro-NOAA opened 1 month ago
@NickSzapiro-NOAA I have created a WW3 issue to track this as well: https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/WW3/issues/1273 for your solution 2, which is more robust although solution 1 is something we can likely get fixed today.
The unstructured grids are 0 to 360. I'd have to look at which HAFS grid we're using to see if it's -180 to 180.
And thank you @NickSzapiro-NOAA for making this issue!! This is a great find, I had forgotten about this issue that we had run into a few years ago.
Description
log.ww3 in various global regression tests show warnings like
*** WAVEWATCH-III WARNING : OUTPUT POINT OUT OF GRID : -85.078 -19.425 32012 POINT SKIPPPED
These occur for locations specified in tests/parm/ww3_points.list with longitudes .LE. 0. Options to fix include:
1 is easiest. Do the WW3 grids used in UFS have a convention for longitudes like [-180°,180°) or [0°,360°)?
To Reproduce:
Run a regression test with ww3 point output at locations specified by tests/parm/ww3_points.list and look at log.ww3