Closed ThieJan closed 3 years ago
@ThieJan Sorry, I did not have time before to check your correction. The correction is good, which gives the advection effect as shown in the following Fig. The T-H-M gives an inaccurate velocity with only one coupling iteration. I think that the benchmark by P. Vogel ' ignores the strain coupling to M.
With this correction and increasing the coupling iterations in T-H-M, the velocity profile in T-H-M is non constant as expected. With more coupling iterations and small time step size, the velocity by T-H-M is more close to that by T-HM. Here is the changed num file of T-H-M, in which you can increase the coupling iteration to get more accurate HM variables.:
thm2_1Dfixd.num.zip
The advective heat transport seem not to work for this coupling.
So far I initialized the coupling pointer of heat transport process to flow process in case the monolithic HM (Deformation_Flow) is used.
Not working yet. See https://github.com/ufz/ogs5/issues/162