ugorji
commented
10 months ago There's no way to connect a encoder directly to a decoder. You need to first decode into a go value, then encode that value into a different format.
If you can arrange to decode a stream of go value(s) into a chan[T], you can encode iteratively into the other format in parallel.
Hi! I am interested in using this library for converting from arbitrary/free-form JSON source data to CBOR, and am wondering if there is a known approach for doing so without needing to decode from JSON into
interface{}, and then encodeinterface{}into CBOR.In theory, since JSON and CBOR (and the other formats this library supports) are all mostly data-model equivalent, is there a path to connecting a decoder into an encoder, and "stream convert" (iterative encode) as tokens are read from the decoder?
Other use cases could be connecting a JSON decoder to a JSON encoder in order to minify or indent the same semantic content while having minimal memory use and while avoiding whole-of-content buffering. Equivalently, canonicalizing or compacting a binary format, potentially even with compaction in-place (i.e. NewEncoderBytes pointing to the same byte slice passed to NewDecoderBytes).
Being able to provide a function to observe or intercept tokens, as can be done with the stdlib's Decoder.Token could also allow for some interesting cases, such as use of JSON Path expressions to extract a subset of the data.
In my particular case, I'm intending to have a regular known-type regular struct with a mix of fixed-type and Ext/ExtRaw fields, where the ExtRaw fields might contain a CBOR tag 24 (Encoded CBOR, a bit like json.RawMessage), and a Data slice populated from separately encoded CBOR data that's ultimately sourced from entirely free-form data. I can arrange to convert the JSON data to CBOR using decode into empty interface, but I'm not sure how to do it in a memory efficient way (i.e. without the redundant reflect-based decode into Go data types).
I look forward to thoughts and guidance on this topic. Thanks!