Closed riga closed 3 months ago
That's a fair point, although I think if we move from pho
to gamma
it will again be inconsistent with the SinglePhoton
Primary Dataset name and thus the DAS keys.
In general I think it's a good idea to be consistent with DAS, as otherwise that might be confusing in particular for new users. So in this case I'm actually mildly in favor of keeping the pho
-based names, but we can of course discuss if we would like to prioritize consistency across campaigns over names that more or less follow the DAS entry.
Consistency with DAS is a good point. I think the issue will be (in potentially many place) that DAS is in itself inconsistent (EGamma, Photon, ...) 🫣
I think I'd be in favor of not passing down this inconsistency to users, but rather use the cmsdb as a "compensatory" layer. But this is quite a choice to make and we should discuss further.
With #13 close to being merged (among others, adding the
data_egamma
process), I noticed that the "single photon" process and some datasets are nameddata_pho(_*)
which might be a bit inconsistent.This PR renames all (not many though) occurrence to
data_gamma
.