search

uhh-cms / cmsdb

CMS related campaigns, processes, cross sections and common definitions for analyses.
GNU General Public License v3.0
1 stars 16 forks source link

Run2 Process Xsecs #26

Closed Bogdan-Wiederspan closed 3 months ago

Bogdan-Wiederspan commented 6 months ago

This PR adds all xsecs for Run2

riga commented 6 months ago

@Bogdan-Wiederspan What would need to be done for this PR to leave the WIP phase?

Bogdan-Wiederspan commented 6 months ago

Nothing needs to be added @riga. I simply forgot to switch the state to "ready to review"

nprouvost commented 5 months ago

Actually not completely true, I am still including updated values using the GenXSecAnalyzer directly instead of cmsdb and there will be a few new processes to include once the run2 campaigns are merged (e.g. several multibosons decay channels like ZZ->QQ)

nprouvost commented 5 months ago

Updated values are now fully included with the corresponding logs and some logs expected to be needed after the merge, only the additional values which will come with the processes added with the merge are missing.

haddadanas commented 4 months ago

resolved Merge conflicts with master :) Question (resolved): If we have a $\pm 2$% uncert is it noted in the scinum version we use as uncert=2j or uncert=0.02j? A few xsecs use the first notation I tested it in the latest version of scinum and the latter would be correct, but I wasn't sure if the notation was different in older scinum versions. I made a commit to correct these and can push it if the second notation turns out to be correct :sweat_smile:

nprouvost commented 4 months ago

Nice, thanks for spotting these

riga commented 3 months ago

Question (resolved): If we have a % uncert is it noted in the scinum version we use as uncert=2j or uncert=0.02j? A few xsecs use the first notation

0.02j is indeed the right way to do it 👍

riga commented 3 months ago

@nprouvost @mafrahm Are the two comments above resolved?