Update Identifier guidelines

[metaweidner]

https://uhlibraries-digital.github.io/bcdams-map/guidelines/identifier

[librarycard]

can we put OCLC number here?

[metaweidner]

@librarycard That seems reasonable. Do you anticipate any other types that we should include in the guidelines?

• ARK
• OCLC
• Call Number
• Location (a.k.a. Original Item Location)

[librarycard]

@metaweidner i think that should cover it -- i can't think of any others at the moment.

[amgaynor]

@metaweidner @librarycard is this also where we would put the accession number? If so, would we follow the format "1970-001, Box 5, Folder 20"? If we did this, however, this particular identifier wouldn't be unique.

[metaweidner]

@amgaynor Uniqueness is not required. The accession number should be sufficient to make that construction useful as an identifier.

[amgaynor]

@metaweidner Ok sounds good. I think we talked about the possibility of Brays generating this field value based on the filename. Does that sound right?

[metaweidner]

Let's use a table for the identifier examples instead of a bulleted list, something like:

Type	Example
Call Number	[call number example]
OCLC Number	[oclc number example]
Archival Location	[archival location example]
ARK	[ark example]

[amgaynor]

I didn't have an example of a real digital object ARK, so I put a fake one in the documentation. I'll update that once we have some real digital object ARKs.

[librarycard]

add to preservation input guidelines: preservation package ark goes here