mkovari
commented
1 month ago Sounds like a great idea, but I would argue that one up-to-date and credible scaling with some thought put into the implementation is better than a dozen scalings that no-one will use.
Note that the Sakai scaling has already been implemented - #3268.
While doing work on #3263, I came across several papers giving lists of bootstrap current scalings not yet implemented in
PROCESSthough could easily be.From the paper by Tobias Hartman there is this list (https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:45031642):
Hoang et al model: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/16442
Andrade and Ludwig model: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/50/6/065001/pdf
ASC model: https://qedfusion.org/LIB/REPORT/CONF/ACTsyscodedocs/ASC_FED2_Dragojlovic.pdf (Seems to be from Zoran Dragojlovic working on the ARIES programme)
TOPPER model: No reference yet
There is also scalings from this paper by Ki. G et.al. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.07.009)
ARIES-SC model: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379610000414 (Seems to be the same as the ASC model above)
Andrade model: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/50/6/065001/pdf -(Same as Andrade and Ludwig from above)
Gi et.al also presents two scalings of their own type
There is also scalings from the recently implemented Sakai et.al paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092037961930818X?via%3Dihub)