Closed jonmaddock closed 4 months ago
In GitLab by @wg7580 on Jul 20, 2022, 09:15
@mkovari is this something that is still an issue? If it is i can try and look into it
In GitLab by @ajpearcey on Aug 5, 2022, 15:26
So this occurring because the Energy confinement times, and required H-factors
part of the output is printed in the subroutine igmarcal
where it computes the confinement times from the subroutine pcond
. So it is ignoring the PLASMOD part of the calculation and in addition is also using the PROCESS definition of the P_loss which maybe different from PLASMOD.
If the value of 0.892 that PLASMOD produces is correct or not is not something I can easily answer.
@mkovari was this a PLASMOD-specific problem or a wider H-factor calculation problem?
It was purely a Plasmod problem.
In GitLab by @mkovari on Jul 11, 2019, 14:57
According to the 2019 baseline Plasmod output (K:\Power Plant Physics and Technology\PROCESS\DEMO Baseline Runs\2019) the H-factor is only 0.892:
and this is repeated in the main part of the output:
However, this value is obviously too small, and it contradicts the table of H-factors:
Checklist