Closed andrewd789 closed 11 months ago
Ulas Karaoz, Ph.D. Research Scientist Climate and Ecosystems Sciences Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 Cyclotron Road, Mail Stop: 70A-3317 Berkeley, CA 94720 Phone: ( <510-486-7490>510) 486 4118 (office) @.***
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 3:21 AM Andrew D @.***> wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for the great package. I have applied microtrait to several metagenomes. Now I wish to interpret the rules and traits detected, but I am puzzled by some aspects of this.
I downloaded the supplementary excel tables from the microtraits publication ( https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbinf.2022.918853/full), to try to determine how the rules and traits matched up with one another. I see that there are 1,445 rules listed (in ST4), but only 975 rules are listed in the rules-to-traits mapping (in ST5). What explains this difference, and how can one interpret the rules not listed in the rules-to-traits mapping?
Thanks,
Andrew.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ukaraoz/microtrait/issues/10, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2IYTOZP7FBW7TWZJ5T6TLXZLWQXANCNFSM6AAAAAA4QFJ6RU . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi, many thanks for the explanation. I will focus on the rules represented in the rule-to-traits table then.
A.
Hello,
Thanks for the great package. I have applied microtrait to several metagenomes. Now I wish to interpret the rules and traits detected, but I am puzzled by some aspects of this.
I downloaded the supplementary excel tables from the microtraits publication (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbinf.2022.918853/full), to try to determine how the rules and traits matched up with one another. I see that there are 1,445 rules listed (in ST4), but only 975 rules are listed in the rules-to-traits mapping (in ST5). What explains this difference, and how can one interpret the rules not listed in the rules-to-traits mapping?
Thanks,
Andrew.