As it turned out, one main reason for the confusion with configuration (resulting in issues like #41, #45 or #46) is the bias between the Step-like workflow configuration and the actual derivates. There are different derivates but all originate from the same, common step configuration type.
Therefore it's far more consistent to have a a 1:1 relationship between configured step types and executed derivateers.
This improves the complete PDF-generation setup, because PDF-specific information like used OCR-input filegroup can be tied rather to a specific PDF-derivate generation step instead of setting global inputs.
Thous it enables us to have several PDF derivates with different inputs in one workflow.
Description
As it turned out, one main reason for the confusion with configuration (resulting in issues like #41, #45 or #46) is the bias between the Step-like workflow configuration and the actual derivates. There are different derivates but all originate from the same, common step configuration type.
Therefore it's far more consistent to have a a 1:1 relationship between configured step types and executed derivateers.
This improves the complete PDF-generation setup, because PDF-specific information like used OCR-input filegroup can be tied rather to a specific PDF-derivate generation step instead of setting global inputs. Thous it enables us to have several PDF derivates with different inputs in one workflow.