Open rainoftime opened 4 years ago
Note to self: the problem here is that r1
occurs in the proof only in quantifier inputs, which are not yet supported. This probably solves itself, when we rework proof production for quantified clauses.
There is another potential issue here, though. If a symbol occurs in the proof, but in no input formula (unlikely, but nothing prevents the proof to contain unnecessary steps involving symbols that are not needed), then the same problem would occur. We may need to put such symbols into some dummy partition.
Related: https://github.com/ultimate-pa/smtinterpol/issues/74
Hi, for the following formula, 757.txt
smtinterpol commit f15aa2170 throws an assertion error