Closed quocnhat closed 4 months ago
👋 Hello @quocnhat, thank you for raising an issue about Ultralytics HUB 🚀! Please visit our HUB Docs to learn more:
If this is a 🐛 Bug Report, please provide screenshots and steps to reproduce your problem to help us get started working on a fix.
If this is a ❓ Question, please provide as much information as possible, including dataset, model, environment details etc. so that we might provide the most helpful response.
We try to respond to all issues as promptly as possible. Thank you for your patience!
@quocnhat hello,
Thank you for your kind words and for reaching out with your question! It's great to hear that you're exploring different deployment options for your YOLOv8 model.
To calculate inference time accurately, it's essential to consider all the steps involved in the detection process. Typically, the total inference time should include:
Here's a basic example of how you can measure the inference time in Python:
import time
import cv2
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
# Load your TFLite model
interpreter = tf.lite.Interpreter(model_path="model.tflite")
interpreter.allocate_tensors()
# Get input and output tensors
input_details = interpreter.get_input_details()
output_details = interpreter.get_output_details()
# Load an example image
image = cv2.imread('example.jpg')
input_data = cv2.resize(image, (input_details[0]['shape'][1], input_details[0]['shape'][2]))
input_data = np.expand_dims(input_data, axis=0).astype(np.float32)
# Measure preprocessing time
start_time = time.time()
# Preprocessing steps (e.g., normalization)
input_data = input_data / 255.0
preprocess_time = time.time() - start_time
# Measure inference time
start_time = time.time()
interpreter.set_tensor(input_details[0]['index'], input_data)
interpreter.invoke()
inference_time = time.time() - start_time
# Measure postprocessing time
start_time = time.time()
output_data = interpreter.get_tensor(output_details[0]['index'])
# Postprocessing steps (e.g., NMS)
# Assuming you have a function `apply_nms` for non-maximum suppression
# output_data = apply_nms(output_data)
postprocess_time = time.time() - start_time
total_time = preprocess_time + inference_time + postprocess_time
print(f"Preprocessing Time: {preprocess_time:.4f} seconds")
print(f"Inference Time: {inference_time:.4f} seconds")
print(f"Postprocessing Time: {postprocess_time:.4f} seconds")
print(f"Total Inference Time: {total_time:.4f} seconds")
Regarding the discrepancy in speed, several factors could contribute to this:
To get a more accurate comparison, ensure that both deployments are measured under similar conditions and that all steps (preprocessing, inference, postprocessing) are accounted for.
If you encounter any specific issues or need further assistance, please provide a minimum reproducible example as outlined here. Additionally, make sure you are using the latest versions of the packages involved.
I hope this helps! If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.
Hi, Thanks for your quick and very clear information. Closing question now, Thank you!
Hello @quocnhat,
You're very welcome! I'm glad the information was helpful to you. 😊
If you have any more questions in the future or need further assistance, feel free to open a new issue. The YOLO community and the Ultralytics team are always here to help.
Happy coding and best of luck with your projects!
Search before asking
Question
Hi, Thanks for your excellent job. I've tested another great deployment with the same tflite model, But the speed is significantly slower than this (x4). May I ask where is the main gap? Does your inference time cover all detection steps? (preprocess, inference, nms) or Does this come from the queue of camera capture?
Additional
No response