`ray[tune]` Windows CI fix

May resolve https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/actions/runs/8962171053

🛠️ PR Summary

_{Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions}

🌟 Summary

This PR updates dependency versions and test conditions for better compatibility and future-proofing.

📊 Key Changes

Upgraded Ray Tune dependency across various files, removing the previous restriction to versions <=2.9.3.
Added new conditions in tests to accommodate changes in support for different Python and PyTorch versions.
Adjusted version checking in tuner.py to require ray version >=2.0.0, aligning with the updated dependencies.

🎯 Purpose & Impact

Enhanced Compatibility: Removing the upper limit on the Ray Tune version used means users and developers can take advantage of the latest features and improvements in Ray Tune. 🆙
Improved Testing: The new skip conditions for tests ensure the project's testing suite remains relevant and robust against the environment it's running in, such as specific Python versions or operating system constraints. 🧪
Future-proofing: By updating dependencies and test conditions, this PR helps ensure the project remains compatible with future releases of its dependencies, reducing potential technical debt. 🚀

These changes aim to maintain the project's relevancy and ensure a smoother development and use experience by leveraging the improvements in dependencies.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.61%. Comparing base (2a67dd0) to head (ba17492).

Files	Patch %	Lines
ultralytics/utils/tuner.py	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #11674 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 70.45% 70.61% +0.16% ========================================== Files 122 122 Lines 15584 15584 ========================================== + Hits 10980 11005 +25 + Misses 4604 4579 -25 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ultralytics/ultralytics/pull/11674/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ultralytics) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Benchmarks](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ultralytics/ultralytics/pull/11674/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ultralytics) | `35.61% <0.00%> (+0.23%)` | :arrow_up: | | [GPU](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ultralytics/ultralytics/pull/11674/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ultralytics) | `37.37% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [Tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ultralytics/ultralytics/pull/11674/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ultralytics) | `66.72% <0.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ultralytics#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

ultralytics / ultralytics