Open LemonGraZ opened 1 month ago
π Hello @LemonGraZ, thank you for reaching out and your interest in Ultralytics π! We recommend visiting the Docs where you can find in-depth information and examples for both Python and CLI usage. Many common questions are addressed there.
If this is a π Bug Report, please provide a minimum reproducible example which will help us assist you better.
For questions on custom training or other β Questions, please supply as much relevant information as possible, like dataset examples and training logs. Ensure you are following our Tips for Best Training Results.
Join our Ultralytics community where it fits you best:
Please upgrade to the latest ultralytics
package, ensuring all dependencies are met. This should be done in a Python>=3.8 environment with PyTorch>=1.8:
pip install -U ultralytics
YOLO can be executed in these environments (all dependencies preinstalled):
If this badge is green, our Ultralytics CI tests are passing. These tests validate all YOLO Modes and Tasks across platforms.
This is an automated response π οΈ, and an Ultralytics engineer will assist you further soon. Thank you for your patience! π
According to ChatGPT and Gemini the following points are related to that decision. To me that sounds pretty reasobable.
Quantization of Regression Outputs: Instead of directly predicting four offsets for each anchor box (as done when reg_max=1), the use of reg_max and the DFL module allows the model to predict a distribution for each offset. This distribution is then used to compute a weighted average, resulting in the final offset value. This approach transforms the regression problem into a classification-like problem, where the model predicts the probability of the offset being at each discrete position within a range.
Improved Precision: By predicting a distribution over possible offsets (with the range defined by reg_max), the model can capture more nuanced information about the position of the object. This helps in improving the precision of the bounding box predictions, as it allows for a more fine-grained representation of the offsets compared to a single direct prediction.
Robustness to Small Variations: Predicting a distribution can make the model more robust to small variations and noise in the training data. Instead of committing to a single prediction, the model can express uncertainty by spreading probability mass over multiple positions, which can lead to better generalization.
Regularization Effect: The softmax operation and subsequent dot product act as a form of regularization. The model is encouraged to produce smooth and coherent distributions, which can help in preventing overfitting to the training data.
You can find the justification for it in YOLOv6 paper
@Y-T-G Thanks, under what key-word do I find that? Is this part of the Distributed Focal Loss (DFL) and thus more related to that paper?
Section 2.3.2
reg_max
is part of DFL.
π Hello there! We wanted to give you a friendly reminder that this issue has not had any recent activity and may be closed soon, but don't worry - you can always reopen it if needed. If you still have any questions or concerns, please feel free to let us know how we can help.
For additional resources and information, please see the links below:
Feel free to inform us of any other issues you discover or feature requests that come to mind in the future. Pull Requests (PRs) are also always welcomed!
Thank you for your contributions to YOLO π and Vision AI β
Search before asking
Question
I am confused about the reasoning and advantages of the reg_max value and the DFL module.
When looking at the ultralytics head each grid cells predicts
reg_max
number boxes (regression to 4 offsets).https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/b89d6f407044276b1f54753ef98c719e89928631/ultralytics/nn/modules/head.py#L37-L38
These boxes are then reduced to a single box (4 offsets from grid center) in the dfl module forward call:
https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/b89d6f407044276b1f54753ef98c719e89928631/ultralytics/nn/modules/head.py#L117-L118
https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/b89d6f407044276b1f54753ef98c719e89928631/ultralytics/nn/modules/block.py#L55-L73
In the DFL we end up with a [batch_size, 4, reg_max, n_anchors] tensor. So per grid cell reg_max times 4 predictions for offsets. Each of the 4 offsets are then softmaxed over the reg_max dimension. These are then dot producted (=weighted) with a range tensor
range(0, reg_max)
.So for a single anchorbox and a single offset the output from the feature map would look like this:
[ -9.6771, -14.3445, -2.0779, 2.3168, 11.0486, 5.1030, 12.7565, 11.8883, 9.3741, -3.8249, -9.6758, -8.6363, 6.8299, -1.3159, 3.2808, 8.3574]
(=16 offsets towards left from a single anchorbox) After softmaxing it looks like this:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0.1098, 0.0003, 0.6059, 0.2543, 0.0206, 0, 0, 0, 0.0016, 0, 0, 0.0074])
And this is then dot producted with the following range tensor:[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]
Resulting in a single offset of6.1526
. This value is then multiplied with the stride of the sourcing feature map and then we have the offset in pixel. This means the maximum object size is15 * 2 * stride
.This process is skipped if
reg_max=1
. In this case every anchor box directly predicts 4 unbound offsets.My Question:
reg_max=1
? What is idea or reasoning behind that?I'd like to understand the thinking behind these design decisions. Thank you all!β€οΈ
Additional
No response