ultralytics / ultralytics

Ultralytics YOLO11 πŸš€
https://docs.ultralytics.com
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
33.22k stars 6.39k forks source link

How to interpret reg_max / dfl? #16903

Open LemonGraZ opened 1 month ago

LemonGraZ commented 1 month ago

Search before asking

Question

I am confused about the reasoning and advantages of the reg_max value and the DFL module.

When looking at the ultralytics head each grid cells predicts reg_max number boxes (regression to 4 offsets).

https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/b89d6f407044276b1f54753ef98c719e89928631/ultralytics/nn/modules/head.py#L37-L38

These boxes are then reduced to a single box (4 offsets from grid center) in the dfl module forward call:

https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/b89d6f407044276b1f54753ef98c719e89928631/ultralytics/nn/modules/head.py#L117-L118

https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/b89d6f407044276b1f54753ef98c719e89928631/ultralytics/nn/modules/block.py#L55-L73

In the DFL we end up with a [batch_size, 4, reg_max, n_anchors] tensor. So per grid cell reg_max times 4 predictions for offsets. Each of the 4 offsets are then softmaxed over the reg_max dimension. These are then dot producted (=weighted) with a range tensor range(0, reg_max).

So for a single anchorbox and a single offset the output from the feature map would look like this: [ -9.6771, -14.3445, -2.0779, 2.3168, 11.0486, 5.1030, 12.7565, 11.8883, 9.3741, -3.8249, -9.6758, -8.6363, 6.8299, -1.3159, 3.2808, 8.3574] (=16 offsets towards left from a single anchorbox) After softmaxing it looks like this: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0.1098, 0.0003, 0.6059, 0.2543, 0.0206, 0, 0, 0, 0.0016, 0, 0, 0.0074]) And this is then dot producted with the following range tensor: [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] Resulting in a single offset of 6.1526. This value is then multiplied with the stride of the sourcing feature map and then we have the offset in pixel. This means the maximum object size is 15 * 2 * stride.

This process is skipped if reg_max=1. In this case every anchor box directly predicts 4 unbound offsets.

My Question:

  1. Why doesn't every anchorbox directly predict 4 offsets like it is the case with reg_max=1? What is idea or reasoning behind that?
  2. How can this dot producted be interpreted? The docstring states "Applies a transformer layer on input tensor..."? How can this be seen as a transformer layer?

I'd like to understand the thinking behind these design decisions. Thank you all!❀️

Additional

No response

UltralyticsAssistant commented 1 month ago

πŸ‘‹ Hello @LemonGraZ, thank you for reaching out and your interest in Ultralytics πŸš€! We recommend visiting the Docs where you can find in-depth information and examples for both Python and CLI usage. Many common questions are addressed there.

If this is a πŸ› Bug Report, please provide a minimum reproducible example which will help us assist you better.

For questions on custom training or other ❓ Questions, please supply as much relevant information as possible, like dataset examples and training logs. Ensure you are following our Tips for Best Training Results.

Join our Ultralytics community where it fits you best:

Upgrade

Please upgrade to the latest ultralytics package, ensuring all dependencies are met. This should be done in a Python>=3.8 environment with PyTorch>=1.8:

pip install -U ultralytics

Environments

YOLO can be executed in these environments (all dependencies preinstalled):

Status

Ultralytics CI

If this badge is green, our Ultralytics CI tests are passing. These tests validate all YOLO Modes and Tasks across platforms.

This is an automated response πŸ› οΈ, and an Ultralytics engineer will assist you further soon. Thank you for your patience! πŸ™

LemonGraZ commented 1 month ago

According to ChatGPT and Gemini the following points are related to that decision. To me that sounds pretty reasobable.

Y-T-G commented 1 month ago

You can find the justification for it in YOLOv6 paper

https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02976

LemonGraZ commented 1 month ago

@Y-T-G Thanks, under what key-word do I find that? Is this part of the Distributed Focal Loss (DFL) and thus more related to that paper?

Y-T-G commented 1 month ago

Section 2.3.2

reg_max is part of DFL.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

πŸ‘‹ Hello there! We wanted to give you a friendly reminder that this issue has not had any recent activity and may be closed soon, but don't worry - you can always reopen it if needed. If you still have any questions or concerns, please feel free to let us know how we can help.

For additional resources and information, please see the links below:

Feel free to inform us of any other issues you discover or feature requests that come to mind in the future. Pull Requests (PRs) are also always welcomed!

Thank you for your contributions to YOLO πŸš€ and Vision AI ⭐