Open Kantiran91 opened 1 year ago
Thr Problem in this case is that the server has no HasInterfaceType references. @xenonforlife Is this a correct behaviour of the Spec that Components have not Interface but only Addins? @GoetzGoerisch @DasbachVDMA In this case we need to implement an solution for the Addins?
Which server is this? The node-opcua sample server with MV2 is not complete.
It is an example server from @xenonforlife based an Unified Automation
@xenonforlife how is this different from a instance perspective than the node-opcua server?
Log:
2023-05-17 11:09:17,327 [DashboardOpcUaClient] WARNING void Umati::Dashboard::DashboardClient::preparePlaceholderNodesTypeId(const std::shared_ptr<const ModelOpcUa::StructurePlaceholderNode> &, std::shared_ptr<ModelOpcUa::PlaceholderNode> &, std::list<ModelOpcUa::BrowseResult_t> &):395 Could not find a possible type for nsu=. Continuing without a candidate. 2023-05-17 11:09:17,328 [DashboardOpcUaClient] INFO void Umati::Dashboard::DashboardClient::preparePlaceholderNodesTypeId(const std::shared_ptr<const ModelOpcUa::StructurePlaceholderNode> &, std::shared_ptr<ModelOpcUa::PlaceholderNode> &, std::list<ModelOpcUa::BrowseResult_t> &):379 Updated TypeDefinition of ComputingDevice to nsu=o
?? p?o?? p?? pH?? phB? p?
??? p> ?pD ??@0?? p?>? 0;?? p?? because the node implements an interface 2023-05-17 11:09:17,328 [DashboardOpcUaClient] WARNING void Umati::Dashboard::DashboardClient::preparePlaceholderNodesTypeId(const std::shared_ptr<const ModelOpcUa::StructurePlaceholderNode> &, std::shared_ptr<ModelOpcUa::PlaceholderNode> &, std::list<ModelOpcUa::BrowseResult_t> &):395 Could not find a possible type for nsu=. Continuing without a candidate.
SDK: Unified Automation Client Version: 2.0.0-rc6-11-g664326a-dirty Companion Specification: MV Part 2
An example Server can be used.