umbraco / Umbraco.Forms.Issues

Public issue tracker for Umbraco Forms
29 stars 0 forks source link

Forms - Webhooks #1141

Open royberris opened 9 months ago

royberris commented 9 months ago

Summary

I would like for the form webhook 'Send to URL' to also send the entry ID of the entry that triggered the webhook. Right now I cannot see the Entry, and I cannot get the entry details. I want this to get the entry from the API and dynamically create an action based on the user input. I don't want to manually map every form entry to the webhook.

Use case

Write all submitted forms to an data lake for analytics Write e-mails to the right contact persons based on the information provided.

github-actions[bot] commented 9 months ago

Hi there @royberris!

Firstly, a big thank you for your suggestion. Every piece of feedback we receive helps us to make Heartcore better.

We really appreciate your patience while we wait for our team to have a look at this. We'll assess whether your suggestion is something we can action and let you know roughly what you can expect next.

We wish we could work with everyone directly and assess your suggestion immediately but we're in the fortunate position of having lots of feedback to work with and only a few humans who are able to do anything with it. We are making progress though, and we'll keep you posted when we have something to report!

Thanks, from your friendly Umbraco GitHub bot 🤖 🙂

jmf-umbraco commented 9 months ago

Hi @royberris,

Thanks for your suggestion. This request is probably a bit more relevant to Umbraco forms, which is a depenedency of Heartcore. I'm going to transfer it to the issue tracker for that project where hopefully it gets a more relevant set of eyeballs across it!

AndyButland commented 9 months ago

It may be the request is more related to Heartcore here with the discussion of webhooks, but within Forms, we have workflows - so is a solution to what you are looking for here @royberris to extend the "Standard Fields" you can opt into including in the data sent to include the record's unique ID too?

image

precary commented 9 months ago

I don't quite understand what the question is, but can't you simple create an alias field with Static value {record.uniqueid} or {record.id} ?