Closed SayTen closed 7 years ago
@SayTen Thank you for this fix. Just tested it out, it works well for me.
@mattbrailsford Do you have any concerns with the JS position calculations being removed?
@leekelleher as long as it's been tested as a regular NC instance as well as inside DTGE and it works fine, I'm happy with the changes
@mattbrailsford 👍 I'll give it some more testing. (I've currently only tested within DTGE)
It works fine with a regular NC.
However I have been playing around with the CSS and tweaked the rules so that the modal opens nearer in relation to the NC.
.usky-grid.nested-content__node-type-picker .cell-tools-menu {
position: relative;
transform: translate(-50%, -25%);
}
Note, adding the
.usky-grid
class selector removes the need to have!important
suffix.
@SayTen - what are your thoughts on the positioning of this?
@leekelleher surely that's only true while "hide label" is false. Might need 2 rules, and then what does one do about DTGE, where the NC is far to the right.
We could of course, increase our minimum version number and use the new ad directive that doesn't have this issue :D
@mattbrailsford Do you know which Umbraco version introduces it? (not that I've heard of the "ad" directive)
@mattbrailsford re: "hide label" ... tried it, works the same.
@leekelleher well, it might not be the "ad" directive, but it's the directive for this dialog :)
Not sure, would have to look back. A lot got added in 7.4.3 I think.
@leekelleher how about with the tree nav hidden?
@mattbrailsford 😩 😃 I've tried with reducing the width, so the content-tree hides... still displays fine (for both with/without label). The modal is always positioned in the centre of the editor control.