[Improvement] Override Umbraco's HasValue() and GetValue() instead of adding new methods HasVortoValue() and GetVortoValue()

[Korayem]

This way, current Razor views and C# code will work respectful of whether the Data Type is Vorto enabled or not.

This is also important for mixing Vorto with other 3rd Party plugins that aren't aware of Vorto.

[mattbrailsford]

I believe this would just result in an ambiguous reference as the runtime wouldn't know which method to use, hence why we have vorto prefixed versions.

[Korayem]

You can always add global reference to required DLL in Views/web.config to avail such library across all views :+1:

[mattbrailsford]

Thanks for the suggestions, but I think I'd prefer to leave it as is as I don't want to cause any confusion with people not knowing if vorto is being used or the default Umbraco GetValue methods. If this is something you want personally then you can always make your own convenience methods to wrap the GetVortoValue methods, however I think from a general perspective, it is much clearer using the explicit GetVortoValue method what the intention is and thus where to look if problems do arise.

[jbreuer]

The reason this is requested is probably related to the Models Builder. See this for more info: https://github.com/zpqrtbnk/Zbu.ModelsBuilder/issues/72#issuecomment-169644502

[mattbrailsford]

I still don't think this would help though as Models Builder would be coded to use the Umbraco implementation so by having the same method name, it wouldn't automatically just use it, Models Builder would have to make an explicit attempt to use it.