search

umd-mith / mishnah

Digital Mishnah
http://www.digitalmishnah.org/
8 stars 5 forks source link

publisher, permissions #7

Closed hlapin closed 12 years ago

hlapin commented 12 years ago

I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by them?

travisbrown commented 12 years ago

The TEI schema itself would allow multiple elements, I think, but the prose of the guidelines suggests this isn't okay, so I'd say go with the semicolon-separated list there.

For collaborators from another group I think s with the usual

and are the way to go. Travis On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, hlapin < reply@reply.github.com > wrote: > > I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do > this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same > publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions > with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by > them? > > --- > > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/umd-mith/mishnah/issues/7
hlapin commented 12 years ago

Makes sense to me. Assuming Trevor agrees, I will make those adjustments and close this issue.

On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Travis Brown wrote:

The TEI schema itself would allow multiple elements, I think, but the prose of the guidelines suggests this isn't okay, so I'd say go with the semicolon-separated list there.

For collaborators from another group I think s with the usual

and are the way to go. Travis On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, hlapin < reply@reply.github.com > wrote: > > I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do > this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same > publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions > with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by > them? > > --- > > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/umd-mith/mishnah/issues/7 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/umd-mith/mishnah/issues/7#issuecomment-3456754
hlapin commented 12 years ago

PS: Any pointer on where I went wrong with my pipeline?

On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Travis Brown wrote:

The TEI schema itself would allow multiple elements, I think, but the prose of the guidelines suggests this isn't okay, so I'd say go with the semicolon-separated list there.

For collaborators from another group I think s with the usual

and are the way to go. Travis On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, hlapin < reply@reply.github.com > wrote: > > I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do > this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same > publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions > with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by > them? > > --- > > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/umd-mith/mishnah/issues/7 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/umd-mith/mishnah/issues/7#issuecomment-3456754
trevormunoz commented 12 years ago

I agree that additional s for the other transcribers is the way to go.

For publishers—if "publisher" seems like the appropriate semantics for all parties then I agree with semicolons. Might one be a and one (or more) a , http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-sponsor.html ?

Either way seems fine to me.