Closed oarcher closed 2 years ago
xds = xsar.Sentinel1Dataset(
'SENTINEL1_DS:S1B_WV_SLC__1SSV_20180323T035038_20180323T042239_010153_012716_226F.SAFE:WV_093',
)
The nesz is very high (around 10). its should be less than sigma0, ie in the (0,0.4) range.
opening the safe with luts=True
give the noise_lut_range
and sigma0_lut
variables:
xds = xsar.Sentinel1Dataset(
'SENTINEL1_DS:S1B_WV_SLC__1SSV_20180323T035038_20180323T042239_010153_012716_226F.SAFE:WV_093',
luts=True
)
the nesz is computed as following:
nesz = ds['noise_lut_range'] / ds['sigma0_lut'] ** 2
sigma0_lut
have the same scale as digital_number
, so the problem doesn't seems related to this variable.
but noise_lut_range
seems to be very high (~2.5e7).
By checking the xpath (/noise/noiseRangeVectorList/noiseRangeVector/noiseRangeLut
) and the xml file, those high values are correctly read from the xml file:
<noiseRangeLut count="138">2.718655e+07 2.702579e+07 2.686711e+07 2.671050e+07 2.655590e+07 2.640882e+07
...
2.530819e+07 2.542972e+07 2.555228e+07 2.564490e+07</noiseRangeLut>
by opening a different SAFE with ipf != 2.9 (here S1B_WV_SLC__1SSV_20210620T154907_20210620T162503_027442_0346FE_262C.SAFE
with ipf=3.31, we can check that the values are not of the same order (~3.5e3):
<noiseRangeLut count="143">3.338909e+03 3.318059e+03 3.298250e+03 3.278777e+03 3.259556e+03 3.240583e+03
...
3.166130e+03</noiseRangeLut>
So, before going further, we have to check with MPC that there is no problems with noiseRangeLut
in the xml file. Can you try to get some infos about that @agrouaze ?
MPC Sentinel-1 group proposed this patch in 2020:
nesz_corrected = nesz / noise_calibration_cst_pp1
noise_calibration_cst_pp1 = {'S1A':
{'wv1':{'EAPold':38.13,'EAPnew':38.13},
'wv2':{'EAPold':36.84,'EAPnew':36.84}
},
'S1B':
{'wv1' : {'EAPold' : 39.30,'EAPnew' : 39.30},
'wv2' : {'EAPold' : 37.44,'EAPnew' :37.44}
}
}
closed by #64 . Noise is patched by default, and can be disabled with patch_variable=False
from Sentinel1Dataset
.
Time serie show negative denoised sigma0 for ipf 2.9:
Expected to see sigma0 positive and close to zero, and plot show values around -10