Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Define "large". Most models I've dealt with in engineering have practical
limits of 300k elements (150k is even large). Beyond that you have
post-processing issues. Also, disk space is not costly, so I'm not convinced
that supporting a .gz would be valuable.
and it would be helpful to have an example...maybe if you made a main BDF with
lots of include files and emailed them to me.
Original comment by mesheb82
on 9 Feb 2012 at 9:24
Can you provide the manual for any version of Nastran that supports this
feature. I'm hesitant to add it because as far as I know, no version of
Nastran does this so it wouldn't get used very often and it would slow down and
complicate the file reading. Also, once you add support for *.gz, a reasonable
argument can be made to add support for *.zip, *.tar.gz, and *.rar.
The more I think about it, the more I wonder about things like INCLUDE files
and the requirements for defining those. A manual from a pre-processor/solver
would greatly help in defining the scope and the interface format.
Original comment by mesheb82
on 11 Feb 2012 at 12:45
A few unrelated questions:
Could you tell me about your intended use for this project, I'd like to make a
library that is useful to people and need some feedback of what people want to
do. I'm having a tough time understanding what you're trying to do if you want
to read the OP4 and the BDF with presumably millions of nodes.
So...
(1) What kinds of problems you're trying to solve (e.g.
static/transient/acoustic)
(2) Are you looking to use an open-source solver or if you're going to stick
with a paid version of Nastran?
(3) Are you doing MDAO (Multi-disciplinary Analysis and Optimization) so
structural, thermal, modal, trajectory, aero, etc.?
(4) What scale of problems are you trying to solve (e.g. models with 100k nodes
in 10 minutes) and do that 100 times in an optimizer?
Anything else you'd like to share. Also, you can email me if you dont want to
share here.
Original comment by mesheb82
on 11 Feb 2012 at 2:40
closed due to inactivity
Original comment by mesheb82
on 4 Jul 2012 at 6:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nils...@googlemail.com
on 9 Feb 2012 at 8:01