Open VladimirAlexiev opened 1 year ago
It's common good practice to include descriptive metadata with each ontology. It should include fields like:
If you agree to do https://github.com/uncefact/spec-jsonld/issues/187, the metadata could be like this (in turtle):
@prefix uncefact: <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/uncefact/>. uncefact: a owl:Ontology; rdfs:label "UNCEFACT Buy-Ship-Pay Reference Data Model"; rdfs:comment "some nice long description"; dct:source <https://unece.org/trade/uncefact/mainstandards>; rdfs:seeAlso <https://github.com/uncefact>, <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/unlocode-vocab/>; dct:created "first publication date"^^xsd:date; dct:modified "last publication date, automatically updated"^^xsd:date.
And for UNLOCODE:
@prefix unlcdv: <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/unlocode-vocab/>. unlcdv: a owl:Ontology; rdfs:label "UNLOCODE geographic gazetteer"; rdfs:comment "some nice long description"; dct:source <https://unece.org/trade/uncefact/unlocode>; rdfs:seeAlso <https://github.com/uncefact>, <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/uncefact/>; dct:created "first publication date"^^xsd:date; dct:modified "last publication date, automatically updated"^^xsd:date.
It's common good practice to include descriptive metadata with each ontology. It should include fields like:
If you agree to do https://github.com/uncefact/spec-jsonld/issues/187, the metadata could be like this (in turtle):
And for UNLOCODE: