uncefact:UNECELOCODE

[VladimirAlexiev]

uncefact.jsonld wrongly defines class uncefact:UNECELOCODE

• The LOCODE instance data uses uncefact:UNLOCODE rather than this name
• Furthermore, this class is not very meaningful semantically (see https://github.com/uncefact/vocab/issues/29), which may be confirmed by its "description" below:

  uncefact:UNECELOCODE  rdf:type  rdfs:Class ;
      rdfs:comment  "LOCODE." ;
      rdfs:label    "UNLOCODE" .

[nissimsan]

@kshychko , uncefact:UNECELOCODE seems like a bug?

[cmsdroff]

I'd favour uncefact:UNLOCODE as its more meaningful and language used in industry

[nissimsan]

Related to #27

[kshychko]

https://github.com/uncefact/codes-locode/blob/main/vocab/unlocode/UNLOCODE.jsonld

[nissimsan]

Will be tackled in https://github.com/uncefact/spec-jsonld/pull/105 also.

[nissimsan]

We did this: https://github.com/uncefact/spec-jsonld/pull/105