Closed pyfisch closed 3 years ago
Good catch!
Gonna change it to MIT.
Any reason for not dual-licensing under Apache-2.0? It is the preferred combination in the Rust ecosystem and many/most crates use it.
I am not a lawyer and can't really comment on the differences between these licenses.
Same.
MIT looks like a more permissive https://choosealicense.com/licenses/ one. So yeah, I can do a dual license MIT/Apache
The LICENSE file contains the Mozilla Public License 2.0 while in Cargo.toml the license is given as "MIT/Apache-2.0".
Guide for
license
field: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html?highlight=license#the-license-and-license-file-fields I assume MPL was the intended license, thenMPL-2.0
is the correct value for this field.