undef1nd / sfv

Structured HTTP field values parsing and serialization. Implementation of RFC 8941 https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc8941.html
Apache License 2.0
25 stars 6 forks source link

Confused about license #84

Closed pyfisch closed 3 years ago

pyfisch commented 3 years ago

The LICENSE file contains the Mozilla Public License 2.0 while in Cargo.toml the license is given as "MIT/Apache-2.0".

Guide for license field: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html?highlight=license#the-license-and-license-file-fields I assume MPL was the intended license, then MPL-2.0 is the correct value for this field.

undef1nd commented 3 years ago

Good catch!

Gonna change it to MIT.

pyfisch commented 3 years ago

Any reason for not dual-licensing under Apache-2.0? It is the preferred combination in the Rust ecosystem and many/most crates use it.

I am not a lawyer and can't really comment on the differences between these licenses.

undef1nd commented 3 years ago

Same.

MIT looks like a more permissive https://choosealicense.com/licenses/ one. So yeah, I can do a dual license MIT/Apache