Open jag3773 opened 4 years ago
Currently I see:
So @jag3773 @birchamp do we actually need to add three new ones (since sadly, we've started building the format into the resource name with TSV_Translation_Notes)?
Seems that some categories start with Bible and some don't. (See _TranslationNotes, vs _Bible_TranslationNotes.) Or is _Bible_StudyNotes really _BibleStudyNotes, cf. _BibleStudyNotes???
Oh, and do we need to add these as well???
After a final decision, @richmahn will need to add them to his manifest schema built into DCS (and copied by me into the Content Validation checks).
@RobH123 and @richmahn Note that in the YAML they are spaced names, "Greek New Testament" becomes "Greek_New_Testament" in the catalog.
The categories are meant to be helpful for tools to get a list of a certain type of material, what needs added is up to the devs based on what they need.
Generally, yes, I agree that we should have new categories for new types/formats of content. For example, the current tC probably uses "Translation Notes" but a future tC would probably hit "TSV Translation Notes".
We need to add the following subject options to the JSON Schema's enum:
History
Larry Hover your mouse over the Invalid label and it tells you. The subject field must currently be one of these (with spaces instead of underscores).
Larry : Robert It is "none of the above." We need categories for Bible Study Notes and Bible Study Questions added. I assume that is quite a process, and I just need to ignore it for now, correct?